#

## Issue PATHNAME-PRINT-READ Writeup

    Status:		Passed, as amended, Jun89 X3J13

    Issue:        PATHNAME-PRINT-READ
    References:   File System Interface (pp409-427)
    Category:     CHANGE/ADDITION
    Edit history: 21-Oct-88, Version 1 by Pitman
    		3-Jul-89, Version 2 by Masinter

    Problem Description:

      Although pathnames are required to print re-readably, there is no
      standardized representation for pathnames and so no standardized
      way in which they should print.

      Further, it is common in programs to want pathnames to print in
      their file-system specific format.

    Proposal (PATHNAME-PRINT-READ:SHARPSIGN-P):

      Define the reader syntax #P"..." to be equivalent to
      #.(PARSE-NAMESTRING "...").

      Define that when *PRINT-ESCAPE* is true, the syntax #P"..." is
      how a pathname should be printed by WRITE (and hence by PRIN1,
      PRINT, etc.). The "..." is the namestring representation of the
      pathname.

      Define that when *PRINT-ESCAPE* is NIL, WRITE writes a pathname
      object P by writing (NAMESTRING p) instead.

    Test Case:

      (PARSE-NAMESTRING "foo.lisp")
      => #P"foo.lisp"

      (FORMAT NIL "Written to ~A." #P"foo.bin")
      => "Written to foo.bin."

      (TYPEP #P"foo.bin" 'PATHNAME)
      => T

    Rationale:

      This satisfies the stated goals.

      [For :ESCAPE T] It will not be possible to make the printed
      pathname printed representation totally portable because of
      variations in file systems, but for different Common Lisp
      implementations on the same file system, or for Common Lisp
      systems running on file systems having compatible syntax,
      portability would be improved by this specification.

      Also, some implementations (eg, Symbolics Genera) use
      specialized representations for pathnames on different file
      systems. Eg, an MSDOS pathname is of type MSDOS-PATHNAME,
      not just type PATHNAME. #S(PATHNAME ...) is not only more
      verbose than necessary but might be misleading to some users
      because the object created will not have a TYPE-OF PATHNAME.

      [For :ESCAPE NIL] Printing the namestring of a pathname is
      a common operation and it is convenient to have a shorthand
      for doing it. Further, some implementations may be able to
      optimize the presentation of a pathname in this mode by
      printing it without actually consing the string.

    Current Practice:

      Symbolics Genera implements the proposed behavior.

    Cost to Implementors:

      Fairly minor changes to the readtable and the printer.

    Cost to Users:

      Users who now use the non-portable syntax #S(...) in order
      to enter literal pathnames might have to change. [However,
      implementations would be free to continue to support this
      read syntax for compatibility.]

    Cost of Non-Adoption:

      Portability of code and data involving pathnames within a
      given file system (or between suitably similar file systems)
      would be hampered needlessly.

    Benefits:

      The cost of non-adoption would be avoided.

    Aesthetics:

      The #P syntax is pretty and hides unimportant details.

    Discussion:

      Pitman supports this change.

    -----
    Summary of discussion on CL-Cleanup:

     EB noted that Lucid CL implements the proposed behavior and that there
      is cost to users who define their own #P read macro. He weakly supports
      the proposal but wishes someone had pursued a `generic pathnames' proposal.

     Pierson noted that KCL uses #"...", but that this collides with proposed
      syntax for Dick Waters' pretty printer. He also thinks #P is better
      because it is already more widely used for that purpose.

     Masinter noted that Envos Medley prints pathnames with the syntax
      #.(pathname "asdf"), which he thinks is not as pretty as #P"asdf"
      but currently more portable.

     KMP and JonL raised the issues that #. has the disadvantage that it must
      be parsed by the full Lisp engine, while #P can be parsed by something
      simpler.  Permitting #. leaves a gaping hole for trojan horses, and
      also requires the presence of the evaluator in a delivery system.

     MLY, GSB, Peirson, and IIM argued for not using up an extra dispatch
     character.

     MLY suggested #S(PATHNAME namestring [optional-host]).

     IIM noted they use #.(PATHNAME namestring host) because different file
      systems have different parsing conventions.

Copyright 1996-2001, Xanalys Inc. All rights reserved.