# Library Coq.ZArith.Zpower

Require Import Wf_nat.
Require Import ZArith_base.
Require Export Zpow_def.
Require Import Omega.
Require Import Zcomplements.
Open Local Scope Z_scope.
Infix "^" := Zpower : Z_scope.

# Definition of powers over Z

Zpower_nat z n is the n-th power of z when n is an unary integer (type nat) and z a signed integer (type Z)
Definition Zpower_nat (z:Z) (n:nat) := iter_nat n Z (fun x:Z => z * x) 1.
Zpower_nat_is_exp says Zpower_nat is a morphism for plus : nat->nat and Zmult : Z->Z
Lemma Zpower_nat_is_exp :
forall (n m:nat) (z:Z),
Zpower_nat z (n + m) = Zpower_nat z n * Zpower_nat z m.
This theorem shows that powers of unary and binary integers are the same thing, modulo the function convert : positive -> nat
Lemma Zpower_pos_nat :
forall (z:Z) (p:positive), Zpower_pos z p = Zpower_nat z (nat_of_P p).
Using the theorem Zpower_pos_nat and the lemma Zpower_nat_is_exp we deduce that the function [n:positive](Zpower_pos z n) is a morphism for add : positive->positive and Zmult : Z->Z
Lemma Zpower_pos_is_exp :
forall (n m:positive) (z:Z),
Zpower_pos z (n + m) = Zpower_pos z n * Zpower_pos z m.
Hint Immediate Zpower_nat_is_exp Zpower_pos_is_exp : zarith.
Hint Unfold Zpower_pos Zpower_nat: zarith.
Theorem Zpower_exp :
forall x n m:Z, n >= 0 -> m >= 0 -> x ^ ( n + m ) = x ^ n * x ^ m.
Section Powers_of_2.

# Powers of 2

For the powers of two, that will be widely used, a more direct calculus is possible. We will also prove some properties such as (x:positive) x < 2^x that are true for all integers bigger than 2 but more difficult to prove and useless.
shift n m computes 2^n * m, or m shifted by n positions
Definition shift_nat (n:nat) (z:positive) := iter_nat n positive xO z.
Definition shift_pos (n z:positive) := iter_pos n positive xO z.
Definition shift (n:Z) (z:positive) :=
match n with
| Z0 => z
| Zpos p => iter_pos p positive xO z
| Zneg p => z
end.
Definition two_power_nat (n:nat) := Zpos (shift_nat n 1).
Definition two_power_pos (x:positive) := Zpos (shift_pos x 1).
Lemma two_power_nat_S :
forall n:nat, two_power_nat (S n) = 2 * two_power_nat n.
Lemma shift_nat_plus :
forall (n m:nat) (x:positive),
shift_nat (n + m) x = shift_nat n (shift_nat m x).
Theorem shift_nat_correct :
forall (n:nat) (x:positive), Zpos (shift_nat n x) = Zpower_nat 2 n * Zpos x.
Theorem two_power_nat_correct :
forall n:nat, two_power_nat n = Zpower_nat 2 n.
Second we show that two_power_pos and two_power_nat are the same
Lemma shift_pos_nat :
forall p x:positive, shift_pos p x = shift_nat (nat_of_P p) x.
Lemma two_power_pos_nat :
forall p:positive, two_power_pos p = two_power_nat (nat_of_P p).
Then we deduce that two_power_pos is also correct
Theorem shift_pos_correct :
forall p x:positive, Zpos (shift_pos p x) = Zpower_pos 2 p * Zpos x.
Theorem two_power_pos_correct :
forall x:positive, two_power_pos x = Zpower_pos 2 x.
Some consequences
Theorem two_power_pos_is_exp :
forall x y:positive,
two_power_pos (x + y) = two_power_pos x * two_power_pos y.
The exponentiation z -> 2^z for z a signed integer. For convenience, we assume that 2^z = 0 for all z < 0 We could also define a inductive type Log_result with 3 contructors Zero | Pos positive -> | minus_infty but it's more complexe and not so useful.
Definition two_p (x:Z) :=
match x with
| Z0 => 1
| Zpos y => two_power_pos y
| Zneg y => 0
end.
Theorem two_p_is_exp :
forall x y:Z, 0 <= x -> 0 <= y -> two_p (x + y) = two_p x * two_p y.
Lemma two_p_gt_ZERO : forall x:Z, 0 <= x -> two_p x > 0.
Lemma two_p_S : forall x:Z, 0 <= x -> two_p (Zsucc x) = 2 * two_p x.
Lemma two_p_pred : forall x:Z, 0 <= x -> two_p (Zpred x) < two_p x.
Lemma Zlt_lt_double : forall x y:Z, 0 <= x < y -> x < 2 * y.
End Powers_of_2.
Hint Resolve two_p_gt_ZERO: zarith.
Hint Immediate two_p_pred two_p_S: zarith.
Section power_div_with_rest.

# Division by a power of two.

To n:Z and p:positive, q,r are associated such that n = 2^p.q + r and 0 <= r < 2^p
Invariant: d*q + r = d'*q + r /\ d' = 2*d /\ 0<= r < d /\ 0 <= r' < d'
Definition Zdiv_rest_aux (qrd:Z * Z * Z) :=
let (qr, d) := qrd in
let (q, r) := qr in
( match q with
| Z0 => (0, r )
| Zpos xH => (0, d + r )
| Zpos (xI n) => ( Zpos n , d + r )
| Zpos (xO n) => ( Zpos n , r )
| Zneg xH => (-1, d + r )
| Zneg (xI n) => ( Zneg n - 1, d + r )
| Zneg (xO n) => ( Zneg n , r )
end , 2 * d ).
Definition Zdiv_rest (x:Z) (p:positive) :=
let (qr, d) := iter_pos p _ Zdiv_rest_aux ( x , 0, 1) in qr.
Lemma Zdiv_rest_correct1 :
forall (x:Z) (p:positive),
let (qr, d) := iter_pos p _ Zdiv_rest_aux ( x , 0, 1) in d = two_power_pos p.
Lemma Zdiv_rest_correct2 :
forall (x:Z) (p:positive),
let (qr, d) := iter_pos p _ Zdiv_rest_aux ( x , 0, 1) in
let (q, r) := qr in x = q * d + r /\ 0 <= r < d.
Inductive Zdiv_rest_proofs (x:Z) (p:positive) : Set :=
Zdiv_rest_proof :
forall q r:Z,
x = q * two_power_pos p + r ->
0 <= r -> r < two_power_pos p -> Zdiv_rest_proofs x p.
Lemma Zdiv_rest_correct : forall (x:Z) (p:positive), Zdiv_rest_proofs x p.
End power_div_with_rest.