| # mem_fn.hpp

## Contents

### Purpose

### Frequently Asked Questions

#### Can mem_fn be used instead of the standard std::mem_fun[_ref] adaptors?

#### Should I replace every occurence of std::mem_fun[_ref] with mem_fn in my existing code?

#### Does mem_fn work with COM methods?

#### Why isn't BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL defined automatically?

### Interface

#### Synopsis

#### Common requirements

#### get_pointer

#### mem_fn

### Implementation

#### Files

#### Dependencies

#### Number of Arguments

#### "__stdcall" and "__fastcall" Support

### Acknowledgements

## Purpose

boost::mem_fn is a generalization of the standard functions std::mem_fun and std::mem_fun_ref. It supports member function pointers with more than one argument, and the returned function object can take a pointer, a reference, or a smart pointer to an object instance as its first argument. mem_fn also supports pointers to data members by treating them as functions taking no arguments and returning a (const) reference to the member.

The purpose of mem_fn is twofold. First, it allows users to invoke a member function on a container with the familiar

        std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), boost::mem_fn(&Shape::draw));

syntax, even when the container stores smart pointers.

Second, it can be used as a building block by library developers that want to treat a pointer to member function as a function object. A library might define an enhanced for_each algorithm with an overload of the form:

    template<class It, class R, class T> void for_each(It first, It last, R (T::*pmf) ())
    {
        std::for_each(first, last, boost::mem_fn(pmf));
    }

that will allow the convenient syntax:

        for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), &Shape::draw);

When documenting the feature, the library author will simply state:

#### template<class It, class R, class T> void for_each(It first, It last, R (T::*pmf) ());

Effects: equivalent to std::for_each(first, last, boost::mem_fn(pmf));

where boost::mem_fn can be a link to this page. See the documentation of bind for an example.

mem_fn takes one argument, a pointer to a member, and returns a function object suitable for use with standard or user-defined algorithms:

    struct X
    {
        void f();
    };

    void g(std::vector<X> & v)
    {
        std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), boost::mem_fn(&X::f));
    };

    void h(std::vector<X *> const & v)
    {
        std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), boost::mem_fn(&X::f));
    };

    void k(std::vector<boost::shared_ptr<X> > const & v)
    {
        std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), boost::mem_fn(&X::f));
    };

The returned function object takes the same arguments as the input member function plus a "flexible" first argument that represents the object instance.

When the function object is invoked with a first argument x that is neither a pointer nor a reference to the appropriate class (X in the example above), it uses `get_pointer(x)` to obtain a pointer from x. Library authors can "register" their smart pointer classes by supplying an appropriate get_pointer overload, allowing mem_fn to recognize and support them.

[Note: get_pointer is not restricted to return a pointer. Any object that can be used in a member function call expression `(x->*pmf)(...)` will work.]

[Note: the library uses an unqualified call to get_pointer. Therefore, it will find, through argument-dependent lookup, get_pointer overloads that are defined in the same namespace as the corresponding smart pointer class, in addition to any boost::get_pointer overloads.]

All function objects returned by mem_fn expose a result_type typedef that represents the return type of the member function. For data members, result_type is defined as a const reference to the type of the member.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Can mem_fn be used instead of the standard std::mem_fun[_ref] adaptors?

Yes. For simple uses, mem_fn provides additional functionality that the standard adaptors do not. Complicated expressions that use std::bind1st, std::bind2nd or Boost.Compose along with the standard adaptors can be rewritten using boost::bind that automatically takes advantage of mem_fn.

### Should I replace every occurence of std::mem_fun[_ref] with mem_fn in my existing code?

No, unless you have good reasons to do so. mem_fn is not 100% compatible with the standard adaptors, although it comes pretty close. In particular, mem_fn does not return objects of type std::[const_]mem_fun[1][_ref]_t, as the standard adaptors do, and it is not possible to fully describe the type of the first argument using the standard argument_type and first_argument_type nested typedefs. Libraries that need adaptable function objects in order to function might not like mem_fn.

### Does mem_fn work with COM methods?

Yes, if you #define BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL.

### Why isn't BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL defined automatically?

Non-portable extensions, in general, should default to off to prevent vendor lock-in. Had BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL been defined automatically, you could have accidentally taken advantage of it without realizing that your code is, perhaps, no longer portable.

## Interface

### Synopsis

    namespace boost
    {

    template<class T> T * get_pointer(T * p);

    template<class R, class T> unspecified-1 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) ());

    template<class R, class T> unspecified-2 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) () const);

    template<class R, class T> unspecified-2-1 mem_fn(R T::*pm);

    template<class R, class T, class A1> unspecified-3 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1));

    template<class R, class T, class A1> unspecified-4 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1) const);

    template<class R, class T, class A1, class A2> unspecified-5 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1, A2));

    template<class R, class T, class A1, class A2> unspecified-6 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1, A2) const);

    // implementation defined number of additional overloads for more arguments

    }

### Common requirements

All `unspecified-N` types mentioned in the Synopsis are CopyConstructible and Assignable. Their copy constructors and assignment operators do not throw exceptions. `unspecified-N::result_type` is defined as the return type of the member function pointer passed as an argument to mem_fn (R in the Synopsis.) `unspecified-2-1::result_type` is defined as `R const &`.

### get_pointer

#### template<class T> T * get_pointer(T * p)

> Returns: `p`.

> Throws: Nothing.

### mem_fn

#### template<class R, class T> unspecified-1 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) ())

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)()` when t is an l-value of type T or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)()` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T> unspecified-2 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) () const)

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)()` when t is of type T [const] or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)()` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T> unspecified-2-1 mem_fn(R T::*pm)

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t)` is equivalent to `t.*pm` when t is of type T [const] or derived, `get_pointer(t)->*pm` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T, class A1> unspecified-3 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1))

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t, a1)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)(a1)` when t is an l-value of type T or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)(a1)` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T, class A1> unspecified-4 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1) const)

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t, a1)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)(a1)` when t is of type T [const] or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)(a1)` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T, class A1, class A2> unspecified-5 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1, A2))

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t, a1, a2)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)(a1, a2)` when t is an l-value of type T or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)(a1, a2)` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

#### template<class R, class T, class A1, class A2> unspecified-6 mem_fn(R (T::*pmf) (A1, A2) const)

> Returns: a function object f such that the expression `f(t, a1, a2)` is equivalent to `(t.*pmf)(a1, a2)` when t is of type T [const] or derived, `(get_pointer(t)->*pmf)(a1, a2)` otherwise.

> Throws: Nothing.

## Implementation

### Files

- boost/mem_fn.hpp (main header)
- boost/bind/mem_fn_cc.hpp (used by mem_fn.hpp, do not include directly)
- boost/bind/mem_fn_vw.hpp (used by mem_fn.hpp, do not include directly)
- boost/bind/mem_fn_template.hpp (used by mem_fn.hpp, do not include directly)
- libs/bind/test/mem_fn_test.cpp (test)
- libs/bind/test/mem_fn_derived_test.cpp (test with derived objects)
- libs/bind/test/mem_fn_fastcall_test.cpp (test for __fastcall)
- libs/bind/test/mem_fn_stdcall_test.cpp (test for __stdcall)
- libs/bind/test/mem_fn_void_test.cpp (test for void returns)

### Dependencies

- Boost.Config

### Number of Arguments

This implementation supports member functions with up to eight arguments. This is not an inherent limitation of the design, but an implementation detail.

### "__stdcall" and "__fastcall" Support

Some platforms allow several types of member functions that differ by their calling convention (the rules by which the function is invoked: how are arguments passed, how is the return value handled, and who cleans up the stack - if any.)

For example, Windows API functions and COM interface member functions use a calling convention known as __stdcall. Borland VCL components use __fastcall.

To use mem_fn with __stdcall member functions, #define the macro BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL before including, directly or indirectly, <boost/mem_fn.hpp>.

To use mem_fn with __fastcall member functions, #define the macro BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_FASTCALL before including, directly or indirectly, <boost/mem_fn.hpp>.

[Note: this is a non-portable extension. It is not part of the interface.]

[Note: Some compilers provide only minimal support for the __stdcall keyword.]

## Acknowledgements

Rene Jager's initial suggestion of using traits classes to make mem_fn adapt to user-defined smart pointers inspired the get_pointer-based design.

Numerous improvements were suggested during the formal review period by Richard Crossley, Jens Maurer, Ed Brey, and others. Review manager was Darin Adler.

Steve Anichini pointed out that COM interfaces use __stdcall.

Dave Abrahams modified bind and mem_fn to support void returns on deficient compilers.

Copyright © 2001, 2002 by Peter Dimov and Multi Media Ltd. Permission to copy, use, modify, sell and distribute this document is granted provided this copyright notice appears in all copies. This document is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as to its suitability for any purpose.