#

## Issue ADJUST-ARRAY-FILL-POINTER Writeup

    Issue:        ADJUST-ARRAY-FILL-POINTER
    References:   ADJUST-ARRAY (p297)
    Category:     CLARIFICATION
    Edit history: 15-Mar-88, Version 1 by Pitman

    Problem Description:

      CLtL does not specify clearly the effect of ADJUST-ARRAY on the fill
      pointer.

    Proposal (ADJUST-ARRAY-FILL-POINTER:MINIMAL):

      Clarify that the :FILL-POINTER keyword argument to ADJUST-ARRAY is treated
      as follows...

      If :FILL-POINTER argument is not given, then the fill-pointer of the array
      to be adjusted (if any) is left alone. It is an error to adjust an array
      to a size smaller than its fill pointer without specifying the :FILL-POINTER
      option so that its fill-pointer is properly adjusted in the process.

      If supplied, the :FILL-POINTER argument must be either an integer between 0
      and the new size of the array, the symbol T (indicating that the new size
      of the array should be used), or the symbol NIL (indicating that the fill
      pointer should left as it is -- as if the :FILL-POINTER option had not been
      specified).

      An error is signalled if a non-NIL value for :FILL-POINTER is supplied and
      the array to be adjusted does not already have a fill pointer.

    Test Case:

      (SETQ A1 (MAKE-ARRAY 5 :FILL-POINTER 3 :ADJUSTABLE T))
      (SETQ A2 (ADJUST-ARRAY A1 4))
      (FILL-POINTER A1) => 3
      (FILL-POINTER A2) => 3

      (SETQ B1 (MAKE-ARRAY 5 :FILL-POINTER 3 :ADJUSTABLE T))
      (SETQ B2 (ADJUST-ARRAY B1 2 :FILL-POINTER 1))
      (FILL-POINTER B1) => 1
      (FILL-POINTER B2) => 1

      (SETQ C1 (MAKE-ARRAY 5 :FILL-POINTER 3 :ADJUSTABLE T))
      (SETQ C2 (ADJUST-ARRAY C1 2 :FILL-POINTER T))
      (FILL-POINTER C1) => 2
      (FILL-POINTER C2) => 2

      (SETQ D1 (MAKE-ARRAY 5 :ADJUSTABLE T))
      (SETQ D2 (ADJUST-ARRAY D1 2 :FILL-POINTER 2)) signals an error.

      (SETQ E1 (MAKE-ARRAY 5 :FILL-POINTER T :ADJUSTABLE T))
      (SETQ E2 (ADJUST-ARRAY E1 4)) is an error.

    Rationale:

      This behavior must be more clearly defined if portable programs are going
      to be able to depend on it.

    Current Practice:

      Symbolics Lisp implements the proposal. In case "E", it does not signal an
      error. It simply leaves the illegal fill-pointer in place so that the
      programmer can correct it using (SETF (FILL-POINTER E2) ...)

    Cost to Implementors:

      Probably most implementations do not deviate significantly from the proposed
      behavior. The cost to implementors is probably very slight.

    Cost to Users:

      None. This clarifies a fuzzy area in the manual which users cannot currently
      depend upon.

    Cost of Non-Adoption:

      The interaction between ADJUST-ARRAY and fill-pointers would continue to be
      hazy, and portable programs would not be able to rely upon that behavior
      being consistent across implementations.

    Benefits:

      The cost of non-adoption would be avoided.

    Aesthetics:

      There is little if any aesthetic impact of this change.

    Discussion:

      Pitman volunteered to write this issue up for the Cleanup committee. He's
      not very passionate about the details one way or another, but figures it's
      a good idea that they be clarified.

       The cleanup committee didn't object.

Copyright 1996-2001, Xanalys Inc. All rights reserved.