Regel 4 - Fortolk i overensstemmelse med det normale brug af ordene i sprog
forrige | Kapitel 3. Regler for Bibel-tolkning (Hermeneutik) | næste

## Regel 4 - Fortolk i overensstemmelse med det normale brug af ordene i sprog

Let literal language be literal and figurative language be figurative. And watch out for idioms, which have special meanings.

### Eksempel 4A

“evil eye” in Mt.6:23.

Rule 1, definition of "evil" and "eye" - no help here. Rule 2, context: seems to confuse us even more. It doesn't seem to fit with what goes before and after! This should tip us off that we aren't understanding it rightly!!

What we have here is a Hebrew idiom, “evil eye”. Let's look up other uses of this idiom: Mt.20:15 "Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with what is my own? Or is your eye envious [lit."evil"] because I am generous [lit. "good"]?" We find that having an "evil eye" is a Hebrew idiom for being stingy or envious. Now go back to Mt.6 and notice how this understanding ties in so perfectly to the context.

### Eksempel 4B

Es.59:1 “Herrens arm er ikke for kort...”

5. Mos.33:27 “han bærer dig på stærke arme...”

References to body parts of God are used by Latter-Day Saints to prove that God was once a man just as we are. Once they convince people of that, they go on to teach that we can become God just like He is! At a lecture he was giving, a group of Mormon elders challenged Walter Martin (author of Kingdom of the Cults) with an enumeration of verses like these. Dr. Martin then asked the Mormons to read one more scripture: Ps.91:4 “He will cover you with His feathers; And under His wings shalt thou trust”. W.M. said, “By the same rules of interpretation that you just proved God to be a man, you just proved that He is a bird”. The Mormons had to laugh as they realised the ridiculousness of their position.

forrige | op | næste
Regel 3 - Fortolk inden for den historiske og kulturelle sammenhæng | hjem | Rule 5 - Understand the purpose of parables and the difference between a parable and an allegory