| Home | Libraries | People | FAQ | More

### Open Issues

- Do we want initializer list support or would the following be OK?:

      int data[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }
      boost::array<int,5> x(data); // or boost::array<int,data> x;

- Could "{ ... }" be used portably instead of "{ { ... } }" to initialize values? 8.5.1 (11) of the Standard seems to allow it; however, gcc 2.95.2 prints a warning message.
- Any way to have determinate initial values and initializer list support?
- Static_casts for reverse iterator stuff?

I'd appreciate any constructive feedback. Please note: I don't have time to read all boost mails. Thus, to make sure that feedback arrives me, please send me a copy of each mail regarding this class.

Last revised: , at GMT | Copyright © 2001 Nicolai M. Josuttis

Design Rationale |  | For more information...