###
14.14.1.19 Surprises

There are some edges in `ctypes` where you may be expect something else than what actually happens.

Consider the following example:

    >>> from ctypes import *
    >>> class POINT(Structure):
    ...     _fields_ = ("x", c_int), ("y", c_int)
    ...
    >>> class RECT(Structure):
    ...     _fields_ = ("a", POINT), ("b", POINT)
    ...
    >>> p1 = POINT(1, 2)
    >>> p2 = POINT(3, 4)
    >>> rc = RECT(p1, p2)
    >>> print rc.a.x, rc.a.y, rc.b.x, rc.b.y
    1 2 3 4
    >>> # now swap the two points
    >>> rc.a, rc.b = rc.b, rc.a
    >>> print rc.a.x, rc.a.y, rc.b.x, rc.b.y
    3 4 3 4
    >>>

Hm. We certainly expected the last statement to print `3 4 1 2`. What happended? Here are the steps of the `rc.a, rc.b = rc.b, rc.a` line above:

    >>> temp0, temp1 = rc.b, rc.a
    >>> rc.a = temp0
    >>> rc.b = temp1
    >>>

Note that `temp0` and `temp1` are objects still using the internal buffer of the `rc` object above. So executing `rc.a = temp0` copies the buffer contents of `temp0` into `rc` 's buffer. This, in turn, changes the contents of `temp1`. So, the last assignment `rc.b = temp1`, doesn't have the expected effect.

Keep in mind that retrieving subobjects from Structure, Unions, and Arrays doesn't copy the subobject, instead it retrieves a wrapper object accessing the root-object's underlying buffer.

Another example that may behave different from what one would expect is this:

    >>> s = c_char_p()
    >>> s.value = "abc def ghi"
    >>> s.value
    'abc def ghi'
    >>> s.value is s.value
    False
    >>>

Why is it printing `False`? ctypes instances are objects containing a memory block plus some descriptors accessing the contents of the memory. Storing a Python object in the memory block does not store the object itself, instead the `contents` of the object is stored. Accessing the contents again constructs a new Python each time!