





X Consortium							J. Brown
INTERNET-DRAFT				      Quarterdeck Office Systems
							     August 1993


	   A Flexible Remote Execution Protocol Based on rsh


Status of this Memo


     This document is being distributed to members of the Internet
     community in order to solicit their reactions to the proposals
     contained in it.  This memo does not specify an Internet
     Standard.	Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

     This document is an Internet-Draft.  Internet-Drafts are
     working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force
     (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that other
     groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
     Drafts.

     Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
     months.  Internet-Drafts may be updated, replaced, or
     obsoleted by other documents at any time.	It is not
     appropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to
     cite them other than as a "working draft" or "work in
     progress."

     To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please
     check the 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the Internet-
     Drafts Shadow Directories on ds.internic.net, nic.nordu.net,
     ftp.nisc.sri.com, or munnari.oz.au.

     This document is filed under "(filename here)".


Background:

One of the X Window System's main strengths is the ability to display
and control graphical applications remotely.  It does not, however,
address the issue of how to start these applications - the application
initiates the connection to the server sitting in front of the user, not
the other way 'round.  Some other, non-X, mechanism must be used to
start the application.






Brown							FORMFEED[Page 1]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Current methods and their problems:

1)   Walk over to the other machine, log in, and run something with its
     display redirected to your workstation.  Not very appealing, but
     simple.  No security problems associated with whether or not you
     should be able to run something on that machine.

2)   Telnet to the other machine, log in, and run something with its
     display redirected to your workstation.  Relatively simple, but
     doesn't allow for starting remote apps using a menu item - requires
     either human intervention or an autologin mechanism with its
     associated troubles.  Security implication is that the password is
     passed "raw" over the telnet connection and is susceptible to
     snooping.

3)   Use one of the non-standard Berkeley UNIX(R) "remote command"
     facilities, or their Kerberized equivalents - rsh, rexec, krsh.
     These can provide for the no-human-involved startup desired for
     menus, but have security implications which have been adequately
     documented elsewhere and require tuning to achieve "desirable"
     operation, or indeed operation at all.

4)   Other proprietary schemes.

Well, (1) is obviously not very pleasant.  (2) isn't much better,
because you can't run things off menu items.  Neither (1) nor (2) is
"friendly" to an automatic session-restart system.  (4), being
proprietary, isn't of much interest in a wide context.	(Note that in
any of these cases once you've started an app, an xterm say, you can ask
it to start others.  This is OK for some people, but not very acceptable
if you want things picked off menus and especially not if you want apps
on various machines picked off the same menu.  It also isn't friendly to
automatic session-restart schemes.)

(3) is what this memo discusses.

Problems:

o    Systems and shells vary in what exactly constitutes a "command" and
     what the syntax is.

o    The apps might not be in the "system default search path".

o    The apps might require additional setup before they can run -
     environment variables, etc.  (LD_LIBRARY_PATH with OpenWindows 2 on
     Suns)





Brown							FORMFEED[Page 2]





DRAFT							     August 1993


o    Resources (TCP connections, processes, etc) get held open on both
     ends to support the (mostly-idle) rsh connection.

o    No standard way to pass environment variables - DISPLAY,
     SESSION_MANAGER, etc.

These issues, both in their complexity and in their system-specificity,
cause continual trouble for less technically aware users and are a
nuisance even for technical users.  In addition, more sophisticated uses
of remote execution mechanisms (session restart for instance) may
require more control over the environment than is available through the
normal rsh mechanism.

The result is that a great deal of system-dependent manual tuning is
required to achieve a pleasant result, where the DISPLAY and
SESSION_MANAGER values (and others in the future) are passed
transparently, where the app actually gets started(!), where unnecessary
resources are not held open, etc.

The obvious answer is to define a "better" remote execution mechanism,
but that has a host of problems - while rsh and friends have their
security problems, at least they are reasonably well understood and the
"trusted" executables have been extensively tested.  A new mechanism
would have to be analysed and tested before it could be trusted.

Better to make effective use of current services, and take advantage of
such services as may become available in the future.  In the future some
better remote execution protocol may become available.	Such a protocol
may address some of the issues this paper is intended to address like
passing auxiliary information, but will probably not address issues like
setting up the environment required to run an X app.  Fine, adopt it,
and adopt conventions like those discussed here to allow its convenient
use for X applications.

In this spirit this paper does not mandate "thou shalt start X apps
using rsh", but rather "If you support X, you should arrange that the
following rsh request will start an X app properly".

Such a solution would be to layer a more flexible protocol on top of rsh
et al, using rsh's standard in/out mechanism to pass initial setup
information to a "helper" program on the other end.  Since rsh (or
whatever) has already handled the security aspects of the request, the
helper need have no particular special privileges and hence adds no new
security considerations.

"Why rsh?"  While this paper refers to "rsh" all over the place, few if
any of the concepts are peculiar to rsh.  Any form of remote execution
protocol that handles the security aspects of remote execution and



Brown							FORMFEED[Page 3]





DRAFT							     August 1993


provides a bidirectional data stream to the resulting program can be
used.  Rsh, rexec, and krsh are obvious examples, but there is no reason
why telnet could not be used, when combined with a scripting mechanism
to do autologin.

"But I don't use X, why do I want this?"  Again, while this paper refers
to X all over the place and the impetus for creation of this protocol is
starting and restarting X applications, the mechanisms defined are as
independent of X as possible and are applicable to non-X start/restart
problems.

"I don't use POSIX.  What do I do?"  The initial target systems are
generally POSIX-based or POSIX-like, and so there are some POSIX-
specific features and lots of POSIX-specific examples, but the protocol
is designed to be operating-system independent.  Such OS independence
is, in fact, one of the primary goals - to provide an OS-independent
remote execution mechanism.


































Brown							FORMFEED[Page 4]





DRAFT							     August 1993


		   The Remote Start Protocol "rstart"

Goals:


o    A requester should be able to have a program started in any of a
     number of predefined "contexts".  (For instance, on a dual-universe
     Berkeley UNIX / System V UNIX system those might be two such
     contexts.	On a system with multiple versions of the X Window
     System installed each would be available as a predefined context.
     A VAX might support VMS and Eunice contexts.)

o    A requester should be able to override (within security bounds
     usual to the system) any aspect of the environment.

o    Neither the requesting program nor the "helper" program on the host
     end should need to have any special privileges.

o    Any parameter of the environment that can be controlled should be
     controllable through this mechanism.  In particular, on POSIX
     systems environment variables, open files(?), umask, current
     directory, etc should all be controllable.

o    The full richness of the host's command argument mechanism should
     be available.  In particular, on POSIX this means that arguments
     may contain any character and may be of any length.

o    Notwithstanding all of the control afforded the requester, none of
     it should be required - the requester should be able to provide
     simple "command lines" which will be executed in the desired
     environment much as if they were typed to a conventional command
     processor.

o    A "Generic Command" mechanism is provided, where standardized
     commands result in an appropriate response, independent of the host
     system.  (This might be considered to be similar to the FTP model,
     where the LIST command will produce a directory listing no matter
     what the underlying system.)


Requesting System Requirements:

The requesting system MUST support an "rsh" client or a suitable
replacement.  Support of the rsh standard error and control connection
is desirable but not essential.

Host System Requirements:




Brown							FORMFEED[Page 5]





DRAFT							     August 1993


The host system MUST support an "rsh" server or a suitable replacement.
Support of the rsh standard error and control connection is desirable
but not essential.  Invocation of the "rstartd" program in the default
rsh environment MUST "work".  On POSIX systems this might require that
rstartd be installed in one of the directories in the default $PATH and
that rstartd not need any non-default shared library setup, etc.  On
other systems it might require that the rsh server specially recognize
the string "rstartd" and take appropriate action.

The protocol itself:

The requesting system makes a remote execution request using rsh (or
other suitable protocol) to execute the program "rstartd".  The host
system responds with any amount of data (to accomodate systems that want
to natter before starting a program), and then sends a line consisting
of (exactly):
     rstartd:<space>Ready:<space><welcome/version message>
Failure to receive this line before the connection closes indicates that
the host system does not support Extended rsh.	A timeout is probably
appropriate in addition.

The requester then sends a series of lines of ASCII specifying the
program to be run and the environment in which it is to be run.  The
request is terminated by a blank line.

Syntax:  rstart data is passed as a series of lines of ASCII, with
spaces delimiting words in each line, terminated by a blank line.  A
"line" is terminated by an ASCII LF.  CRs and NULs MUST be ignored, to
allow for a system transmitting in Internet NVT ASCII.	(Yes, rsh et al
are POSIX-style tools and won't have CRs, but if there's ever an
Internet standard remote exec mechanism it will almost certainly require
NVT ASCII, so it seems wise to provide for that possibility from the
start.)  It is explicitly allowed for a system to discard characters
other than LF outside the range decimal 32-126; characters outside that
range MUST NOT be used.  Words may contain spaces and non-printable
characters by representing them as octal escape sequences consisting of
a backslash followed by three octal digits.  Note that backslashes
themselves MUST be passed using this mechanism.  Thus the initial
parsing sequence consists of:


1)   Receive data until the first blank line.

2)   Break data into lines at LFs, discarding CRs and NULs.

3)   Break lines into words at spaces.





Brown							FORMFEED[Page 6]





DRAFT							     August 1993


4)   Translate \nnn sequences in words into the appropriate characters.

5)   Process each line as appropriate.

6)   Pass (or more likely, allow to be passed) the connection and any
     data after the blank line to the program.	(??? Hmm.  stdio
     buffering considerations.	Byte count instead of blank line?)

The first word of each line is a keyword specifying the interpretation
of the line.  Keywords SHOULD be transmitted as shown in this document,
but the receiver MUST accept them in any case, even mIxEd.

Unless otherwise specified, only one instance of any given keyword is
permitted in a given request.  CONTEXT MUST be specified first, and
after that keywords may be given in any order.

After receiving the blank line, the host responds with any number of
lines of output of the following forms, terminated by a blank line.

rstartd: Ready: <message>

     (This isn't one of the "response" lines, but it's included here for
     completeness.)  This is rstartd's "hello" line, and confirms that
     the host does indeed support rstartd.


rstartd: Failure: <message>

     An unrecoverable error has occurred which indicates that either the
     requester or the host is fatally misconfigured.  This might occur
     if, for instance, a request is malformed or a required
     configuration file is not present.


rstartd: Error: <message>

     An unrecoverable error has occurred which indicates that the
     request is in error.  The most common such error would be that the
     requested program is unavailable.


rstartd: Warning: <message>

     A recoverable error has occurred.	The program will be executed but
     may not behave as desired.


rstartd: Success: <message>



Brown							FORMFEED[Page 7]





DRAFT							     August 1993


     No errors were detected.  Unfortunately this does not mean that no
     errors will occur, because there are many classes of errors that
     cannot be detected until rstartd actually attempts to pass control
     to the program.


rstartd: Debug: <message>

     A debug message.  Programs (and most humans!) should ignore these.


<anything else>

     Indicates that something else in the system just HAD to say
     something; should be treated as a Warning.




































Brown							FORMFEED[Page 8]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Keywords

CONTEXT name

Initializes defaults suitable for the specified context.  See the
section on contexts for more information.

CONTEXT must be present, and must be the first line of the request.

CMD command args args args

Executes the specified command with the specified arg in the same
general way as it would have been executed if typed to a the user's
command interpreter.  (If the user's primary interface is not a command
language, a system default command language should be used.)  It is
expected that the command will have been provided by a user, who will
expect "normal" command language handling of it.  (For POSIX people,
consider this as roughly equivalent to system().)

Note:  No particular parsing or interpretation is guaranteed.  The
interpretation should be unsurprising to an ordinary user of the host
system.  This mechanism is therefore unsuitable for completely automated
use; EXEC and GENERIC-CMD are provided for that purpose.

Exactly one of CMD, EXEC, or GENERIC-CMD must be present.

EXEC progname namearg arg arg arg ...

Executes a program using a low-level execution mechanism which provides
minimal interpretation; in particular a command processor should not
enter the picture and no quoting other than that required by this
protocol should be required.  It is expected that this interface will be
used by programs requesting restart; presumably they know exactly what
their desired arguments are and a command processor will only confuse
the issue.  (For POSIX people, consider this to be like execlp().)

Progname is the name of the executable.  This will typically be a single
word but is allowed to be a (system-specific) full filename
specification; if the latter then the behavior is system-specific but
normally path searching would be disabled.

Namearg should be the program name as it should be passed to the
program.  Generally, it should be exactly equal to progname.  Hosts
which do not pass a program's name to it should ignore it.

The args are the arguments to be passed to the program.  Hosts which do
not separate their arguments into words should concatenate the arguments
back together with spaces between them.  (Optionally, they could elect



Brown							FORMFEED[Page 9]





DRAFT							     August 1993


to not fully parse the line, and leave in the spaces as originally
delivered.)

Note:  The interpretation of the command may not be intuitive to an
ordinary user of the host system; this interface is for precision, not
intuition.

Exactly one of CMD, EXEC, or GENERIC-CMD must be present.

DIR initial-directory

Specifies (in a system-specific way) the initial default file system
location for the program.  If no DIR line is supplied the program is
started in a system-specific initial location, presumably the user's
"home".

Note:  It is expected that this value would come from a source with a
priori knowlege of the host - either the user or a "restart" request.
It is not expected that an automated mechanism with no advance knowlege
would be able to make use of this request.

MISC registryname name=value

Passes a value to the program using a system-specific mechanism.  (Under
POSIX and similar systems environment variables should generally be
used.)	The registryname specifies the naming authority, and is intended
to prevent conflicts and allow for intelligent conversion.  The idea is
that systems that understand a given registry will map these straight
into environment variables.  Systems that don't entirely understand a
given registry or use a different but convertable mechanism can be picky
and convert as needed.	An appendix lists the names that all systems are
strongly encouraged to support.

Note:  The names in the "suggested" appendix are expected to be supplied
by requesters with no advance knowlege of the host, only the blind
assumption that the host will support those "well-known" names with
their "well-known" semantics.  Other names may be used by requesters
with advance knowlege of the host - restart requests, for example.

Any number of MISC lines may be present.

DETACH

This line directs rstartd to attempt to "detach" the resulting process
from the rsh connection, leaving as little overhead (processes,
connections, etc) as possible.	In POSIX-land, this will probably
consist of redirecting standard input, output, and error to /dev/null or
a log file and then executing the program using fork() and exec() and



Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 10]





DRAFT							     August 1993


not having the parent wait.

It would be nice to have a mechanism for specifying where the output
should be redirected - log file or perhaps log/display program/server.
For the moment that's left as a matter of local implementation and
configuration.

Only one of DETACH and NODETACH may be present.

NODETACH

This line directs rstartd to attempt NOT to "detach".  It is intended to
allow one to override a configuration default to DETACH.

Only one of DETACHand NODETACH may be present.

AUTH authscheme authdata ...

Specifies authentication data to be used by the specified authentication
scheme.  This keyword may be given multiple times to give data for
multiple authentication schemes or for a single scheme to use for
multiple purposes.





























Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 11]





DRAFT							     August 1993


System-specific lines begin with SYSTEMNAME-.  No system-independent
line will be defined that includes a "-" in its name.  X- is reserved
for experimental use.  ("Reserved" is an interesting word, there;
anybody can use X- for experiments and nobody can rely on there not
being a conflict.)  INTERNAL- is reserved for internal use by rstartd.

POSIX-UMASK nnn

Sets the POSIX umask to nnn (octal).

MSDOS-DIR d:path

Sets the current directory on drive d: to path.  This differs from DIR
in that DIR sets the current working drive and directory and MSDOS-DIR
doesn't set the current drive; MSDOS-DIR would be used to set the
current directory on drives other than the current one.

DESQVIEW-MEM nnn

Requests nnn kilobytes of conventional memory.

DESQVIEW-EXPMEM nnn

Requests nnn kilobytes of expanded memory.  (To be more verbose,
requests that the "max expanded memory" parameter be nnn.)

GENERIC-xxx

The GENERIC system is a hypothetical system that offers various services
that can be supported on different real systems; it provides a common
interface for heterogenous systems.

GENERIC-CMD generic-command-name args ...

Runs the local equivalent to generic-command-name.  See the section on
generic commands for more information.	Exactly one of CMD, EXEC, or
GENERIC-CMD must be present.














Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 12]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Generic Commands

Unless otherwise noted, generic commands are optional.

GENERIC-CMD Terminal

Runs a default terminal emulator for the current context.  (It's not
clear what, if anything, this means outside a windowing system context.)
In POSIX X contexts this probably means xterm.

GENERIC-CMD LoadMonitor

Runs a default load monitor for the current context.  In POSIX X
contexts, this probably means xload.

GENERIC-CMD ListContexts

Sends to standard output a list of available contexts, one per line,
with a comma-separated list of context names followed by a space
followed by a brief description of the context.  If multiple context
names invoke the same context (as for instance X, X11, and X11R4 might)
ListContexts SHOULD list the most specific context first.

This command MUST be available in the Default context, and SHOULD be
available in every context.

GENERIC-CMD ListGenericCommands

Sends to standard output a list of generic commands available in the
current context, one per line, with the command name followed by a space
followed by a brief description of the command.

This command SHOULD be available in every context.


















Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 13]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Contexts

A request can specify what context a program should be run in.	A
context will most likely include a set of default values for all of the
controllable aspects of the program's execution environment.

Examples of Predefined Context Names

None	  A minimal environment.  Under POSIX, no environment variables.
Default        The default environment.
X	  The X Window System, any version
X11	  Version 11 of the X Window System, any release
X11R4	       Version 11 of the X Window System, Release 4
X11R5	       Version 11 of the X Window System, Release 5
OpenWindows    Sun's OpenWindows, any version
OpenWindows2   Version 2 of Sun's OpenWindows
OpenWindows3   Version 3 of Sun's OpenWindows
NeWS	  Some version of Sun's Network Window System.

Contexts are allowed (encouraged even) to support multiple names for the
same environment configuration.  For instance: "X", "X11", "X11R4" might
all refer to exactly the same configuration.  "OpenWindows3" might well
refer to a configuration that is a union of "X11R4" and "NeWS".




























Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 14]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Suggested "required" MISC commands

General

For most of these the "simple" behavior is to simply pass the value to
the app as an environment variable.  This should be appropriate on any
POSIX systems.	Other systems should use whatever mechanism is
appropriate to the given item; note that different mechanisms may be
appropriate to different items.

All systems are encouraged to "understand" all of these names,
translating them as appropriate to the local environment.

MISC X LANG=locale identifier

Specifies the locale desired.  If POSIX specifies a list of locale
identifiers then we can use that (and move it to the POSIX registry),
but if not then we will have to define a list (perhaps based on a good
de facto standard).  Note that if there is no POSIX-standardized list of
locale names the host SHOULD translate from our list to the local list.
Note that this is based on the POSIX LANG environment variable, but
rumor says that POSIX does not specify a list of identifiers; since we
want a standarized list we must specify a registry and must assume
"control" of the name.	If in the future POSIX specifies a different
list then during a transition period MISC X LANG and MISC POSIX LANG
would perform similar functions but using different names for the
locales. [[ It may be that ISO country/language codes may supply a
suitable registry. -- jb ]]

MISC X DISPLAY=host:displaynum

Specifies the X server the app is to connect to.

MISC X SESSION_MANAGER=tcp/host:port

Specifies the session manager the app is to connect to.

MISC POSIX TZ=time zone info

Specifies the time zone the user is in, using POSIX standard notation.











Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 15]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Specific Notes on use of Extended rsh with the X Window System

To start an X program, the requester should specify an X context ("X" if
nothing else) and specify the display parameter by saying

     MISC X DISPLAY=host:port.screen

If the program is to join a session the requester should say:

     MISC X SESSION_MANAGER=tcp/host:port


An X host MUST understand at least the X context and MUST, regardless of
whether or not it has environment variables as a system concept,
interpret MISC X DISPLAY=host:port and pass it to the program in
whatever way is locally appropriate.  An X host supporting session
management (which all will do by the time this is adopted, right?)  MUST
interpret MISC X SESSION_MANAGER=tcp/host:port similarly.

An X host MUST understand the X11 authentication scheme for the AUTH
keyword.  The data given MUST be in the form given by "xauth list" and
understood by "xauth add".  AUTH X11 may be given several times to pass
multiple kinds of authorization data or data about multiple displays.

Input methods?	Extensibility?	(Would be nice if new features could be
incorporated without new rstartd executables, which argues for passing
most data as environment variables.)
























Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 16]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Suggestions for Implementation

Configurability, extensibility.  Nobody is ever happy with the default.
The host implementation should allow for as much configurability and
extensibility as possible.  In particular, provision should be made for
administrator- and user- defined contexts, with user defined contexts
overriding or augmenting the administrator-defined and system-supplied
contexts.  One good implementation scheme would be to have system-wide
and per-user configuration files which use the same syntax as the
protocol.  ListContexts SHOULD list both system-wide and per-user
contexts.

Provision SHOULD be made for administrator- and user- defined generic
commands, with user-defined commands overriding system-wide ones.
ListGenericCommands SHOULD list both.




































Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 17]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Notes on Outstanding specification issues

Note:  This is not part of the proposal.

Syntax

     The syntax is OK so far for machine generation, but is yucky for
     human generation, especially spaces in environment variables in
     config files.


Environment variables

     it would be nice if one could say things like $HOME in values,
     especially in config files.


Error handling

     how to reliably mark successfully starting the app.  Can report
     syntax errors or lack thereof, but reporting startup or execution
     errors is problematical.  (Application execution errors are tough
     no matter what; startup errors are tough because you want to report
     an error if the exec*() fails, but if it succeeds you don't have
     the opportunity to give a success report.) [[Clive gives a clever
     trick for reliably distinguishing success, but I think there's a
     race condition if the app is allowed to use the rsh channel for
     output after it starts. -- jb]]


Error handling

     how to report post-startup errors and warnings to the user.  (Can
     say "not our problem", but it would be nice if there was a standard
     way to say "give output to a program that will report it back to
     the user" or something like that.	Session Manager "death reason"
     messages might be adequate, but don't cover warnings.)


I18n

     What character set should messages and requests be in?  Can this be
     determined by the locale as specified by MISC X LANG?  (Does this
     require that MISC X LANG be one of the first lines?)


Protocol




Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 18]





DRAFT							     August 1993


     One reviewer suggests an FTP- and SMTP- style protocol with
     requests and responses.  Personally I don't think individual
     responses to the lines are required and that the roundtrips
     involved would be wasted.	The entire conversation is a single
     request and can be rejected or accepted en toto.  The response
     mechanism does not provide for fabulously rich interpretation by an
     automaton, but it does allow for a success / serious failure /
     routine failure / warning distinction.


Multiple requests/connection

     Some have suggested that you should be able to start multiple
     programs with a single connection, either to start multiple apps on
     login or to allow a "master" to request apps occasionally during
     the course of a session.  As doing so would make it less possible
     (or at least more difficult) to use the data channel for
     communicating with the app after start, and as the overhead of
     starting a new connection isn't all that high, I'm not enchanted
     with the idea.  Admittedly, if the overhead involved got higher
     (how fast is a Kerberos authentication?)  it might become more
     attractive.





























Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 19]





DRAFT							     August 1993


Conclusion:

A small protocol could be easily defined which would layer on top of a
relatively primitive remote execution facility like rsh, rexec, or krsh,
that would allow flexible application startup in a fairly machine-
independent way.  By mandating appropriate local configuration, X
applications could be started (or restarted) conveniently, without
requiring the requester to understand the detailed requirements of the
remote system.	The implementation cost, for both the requester and the
"server", is small.  Security issues are "not our problem", since they
are all handled by existing protocols.

Security Considerations


     Security is assumed handled by the underlying remote execution
     mechanism.  The "helper" program described by this memo runs
     with the privileges of the user and so generally introduces no
     additional security considerations.  Systems where security is
     controlled by controlling what programs may be run - where
     programs are trusted but users are not - may see a security
     impact unless their "helper" is careful about what programs it
     is willing to run.


Copyright


     Copyright (c) 1993 Quarterdeck Office Systems

     Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this
     software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby
     granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice
     appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and
     this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and
     that the name Quarterdeck Office Systems, Inc. not be used in
     advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of this
     software without specific, written prior permission.

     THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED `AS-IS'.  QUARTERDECK OFFICE
     SYSTEMS, INC., DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS
     SOFTWARE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES
     OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR
     NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL QUARTERDECK OFFICE
     SYSTEMS, INC., BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING
     SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOSS
     OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY
     THEREOF, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT,



Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 20]





DRAFT							     August 1993


     TORT OR NEGLIGENCE, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
     USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.


Author's  Address:


     Jordan Brown
     Quarterdeck Office Systems
     Santa Monica, CA
     jbrown@qdeck.com








































Brown						       FORMFEED[Page 21]


