\Header{judges}{Lawyer's rating's of State Judges in the Superior Court.}
\keyword{datasets}{judges}
\begin{Usage}
\begin{verbatim}data(judges)\end{verbatim}
\end{Usage}
\begin{Format}
A data frame contaning 43 observations on 12 variables.
\Tabular{rlll}{
[,1]  & CONT  & numeric  & Number of contacts \\{}
& & & of lawyer with judge. \\{}
[,2]  & INTG  & numeric  & Judicial integrity.\\{}
[,3]  & DMNR  & numeric  & Demeanor.\\{}
[,4]  & DILG  & numeric  & Diligence.\\{}
[,5]  & CFMG  & numeric  & Case flow managing.\\{}
[,6]  & DECI  & numeric  & Prompt decisions.\\{}
[,7]  & PREP  & numeric  & Preparation for trial.\\{}
[,8]  & FAMI  & numeric  & Familiarity with law.\\{}
[,9]  & ORAL  & numeric  & Sound oral rulings.\\{}
[,10]  & WRIT  & numeric  & Sound written rulings.\\{}
[,11]  & PHYS  & numeric  & Physical ability.\\{}
[,12]  & RTEN  & numeric  & Worthy of retention.\\{}
}\end{Format}
\begin{Source}
New Haven Register, 14 January, 1977 (from John Hartigan).\end{Source}

