                           Committer's Guide

  The FreeBSD Documentation Project

   Copyright (c) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,
   2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 The FreeBSD Documentation Project

   $FreeBSD:
   doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.sgml,v 1.290
   2010/07/31 10:39:08 pgj Exp $

   FreeBSD is a registered trademark of the FreeBSD Foundation.

   Coverity is a registered trademark; Coverity Extend, Coverity
   Prevent and Coverity Prevent SQS are trademarks of Coverity, Inc.

   CVSup is a registered trademark of John D. Polstra.

   IBM, AIX, EtherJet, Netfinity, OS/2, PowerPC, PS/2, S/390, and
   ThinkPad are trademarks of International Business Machines
   Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both.

   Intel, Celeron, EtherExpress, i386, i486, Itanium, Pentium, and
   Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation
   or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

   SPARC, SPARC64, SPARCengine, and UltraSPARC are trademarks of
   SPARC International, Inc in the United States and other countries.
   SPARC International, Inc owns all of the SPARC trademarks and
   under licensing agreements allows the proper use of these
   trademarks by its members.

   Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to
   distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those
   designations appear in this document, and the FreeBSD Project was
   aware of the trademark claim, the designations have been followed
   by the "(TM)" or the "(R)" symbol.

   This document provides information for the FreeBSD committer
   community. All new committers should read this document before
   they start, and existing committers are strongly encouraged to
   review it from time to time.

   Almost all FreeBSD developers have commit rights to one or more
   repositories. However, a few developers do not, and some of the
   information here applies to them as well. (For instance, some
   people only have rights to work with the Problem Report database).
   Please see Section 14 for more information.

   This document may also be of interest to members of the FreeBSD
   community who want to learn more about how the project works.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

1 Administrative Details

  Main CVS Repository Host ncvs.FreeBSD.org                              
  Main Subversion          svn.FreeBSD.org                               
  Repository Host          
  Login Methods            ssh(1), protocol 2 only                       
  Main CVSROOT             ncvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs (although also    
                           see Section 3).                               
  Main Subversion Root     svn+ssh://svn.FreeBSD.org/base (although also 
                           see Section 3).                               
  Main CVS Repository      Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> and Simon L.   
  Meisters                 Nielsen <simon@FreeBSD.org>, as well as Josef 
  <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org>     Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> and Joe Marcus   
                           Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> for ports/        
  Problem Report Database  Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> Mark       
  administrators           Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, Remko Lodder   
  <bugmeister@FreeBSD.org> <remko@FreeBSD.org>, and Volker Werth         
                           <vwe@FreeBSD.org> .                           
                           FreeBSD doc/ developers mailing list, FreeBSD 
                           doc/ committer's mailing list; FreeBSD ports/ 
                           developers mailing list, FreeBSD ports/       
                           committer's mailing list; FreeBSD src/        
                           developers mailing list, FreeBSD src/         
                           committer's mailing list. (Each project       
  Mailing Lists            repository has its own -developers and        
                           -committers mailing lists. Archives for these 
                           lists may be found in files                   
                           /home/mail/repository-name-developers-archive 
                           and                                           
                           /home/mail/repository-name-committers-archive 
                           on the FreeBSD.org cluster.)                  
  Core Team monthly        /home/core/public/monthly-reports on the      
  reports                  FreeBSD.org cluster.                          
  Noteworthy CVSup Tags    RELENG_6 (6.X-STABLE), RELENG_7 (7.X-STABLE), 
                           RELENG_8 (8.X-STABLE), HEAD (-CURRENT)        
  Noteworthy SVN Branches  stable/6 (6.X-STABLE), stable/7 (7.X-STABLE), 
                           stable/8 (8.X-STABLE), head (-CURRENT)        

   It is required that you use ssh(1) or telnet(1) with Kerberos 5 to
   connect to the project hosts. For ssh(1) only protocol 2 is
   allowed. These are generally more secure than plain telnet(1) or
   rlogin(1) since credential negotiation will always be encrypted.
   All traffic is encrypted by default with ssh(1). With utilities
   like ssh-agent(1) and scp(1) also available, ssh(1) is also far
   more convenient. If you do not know anything about ssh(1), please
   see Section 9.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

2 Commit Bit Types

   The FreeBSD repository has a number of components which, when
   combined, support the basic operating system source,
   documentation, third party application ports infrastructure, and
   various maintained utilities. When FreeBSD commit bits are
   allocated, the areas of the tree where the bit may be used are
   specified. Generally, the areas associated with a bit reflect who
   authorized the allocation of the commit bit. Additional areas of
   authority may be added at a later date: when this occurs, the
   committer should follow normal commit bit allocation procedures
   for that area of the tree, seeking approval from the appropriate
   entity and possibly getting a mentor for that area for some period
   of time.

   Committer Type Responsible Tree Components                         
   src            core@       src/, doc/ subject to appropriate       
                              review                                  
   doc            doceng@     doc/, www/, src/ documentation          
   ports          portmgr@    ports/                                  

   Commit bits allocated prior to the development of the notion of
   areas of authority may be appropriate for use in many parts of the
   tree. However, common sense dictates that a committer who has not
   previously worked in an area of the tree seek review prior to
   committing, seek approval from the appropriate responsible party,
   and/or work with a mentor. Since the rules regarding code
   maintenance differ by area of the tree, this is as much for the
   benefit of the committer working in an area of less familiarity as
   it is for others working on the tree.

   Committers are encouraged to seek review for their work as part of
   the normal development process, regardless of the area of the tree
   where the work is occurring.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  2.1 Policy for doc/ committer activity in src/

     * doc committers may commit documentation changes to src files,
       such as man pages, READMEs, fortune databases, calendar files,
       and comment fixes without approval from a src committer,
       subject to the normal care and tending of commits.

     * doc committers may commit minor src changes and fixes, such as
       build fixes, small features, etc, with an "Approved by" from a
       src committer.

     * doc committers may seek an upgrade to a src commit bit by
       acquiring a mentor, who will propose the doc committer to
       core. When approved, they will be added to 'access' and the
       normal mentoring period will ensue, which will involve a
       continuing of "Approved by" for some period.

     * "Approved by" is only acceptable from non-mentored src
       committers -- mentored committers can provide a "Reviewed by"
       but not an "Approved by".

     --------------------------------------------------------------

3 Version Control System Operations

   It is assumed that you are already familiar with the basic
   operation of the version control systems in use. Traditionally
   this was CVS, but as of June 2008, Subversion is used for the src
   tree.

   The CVS Repository Meisters <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org> are the "owners"
   of the repository and are responsible for direct modification of
   it for the purposes of cleanup or fixing some unfortunate abuse of
   the version control system by a committer. Should you cause some
   repository accident, say a bad import or a bad tag creation, mail
   the responsible part of CVS Repository Meisters
   <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org>, as stated in the table below, (or call one
   of them) and report the problem. For very important issues
   affecting the entire tree--not just a specific area--you can
   contact the CVS Repository Meisters <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org>. Please
   do not contact the CVS Repository Meisters <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org>
   for repocopies or other things that the more specific teams can
   handle.

   The only ones able to directly fiddle the repository bits on the
   repository hosts are the repomeisters. To enforce this, there are
   no login shells available on the repository machines, except to
   the repomeisters.

     Note: Depending on the affected area of the repository, you
     should send your request for a repocopy to one of the following
     email addresses. Email sent to these addresses will be forwarded
     to the appropriate repomeisters.

       * pcvs@ - regarding /home/pcvs, the ports repository

       * dcvs@ - regarding /home/dcvs, the doc repository

       * projcvs@ - regarding /home/projcvs, the third party projects
         repository

   The FreeBSD repositories are currently split into four distinct
   parts, namely doc, ports, projects and src. These are combined
   under a single CVSROOT when distributed via CVSup for the
   convenience of our users. The src tree is automatically exported
   to CVS for compatibility reasons only (e.g. CVSup). The "official"
   src repository is not stored in CVS but in Subversion. The
   official and exported trees are not necessarily equal.

     Note: Note that the www module containing sources for the
     FreeBSD website is contained within the doc repository.

   The CVS repositories are hosted on the repository machines.
   Currently, each of the repositories above reside on the same
   physical machine, ncvs.FreeBSD.org, but to allow for the
   possibility of placing each on a separate machine in the future,
   there is a separate hostname for each that committers should use.
   Additionally, each repository is stored in a separate directory.
   The following table summarizes the situation.

   Table 1. FreeBSD CVS Repositories, Hosts and Directories

   Repository        Host           Directory   
   doc        dcvs.FreeBSD.org    /home/dcvs    
   ports      pcvs.FreeBSD.org    /home/pcvs    
   projects   projcvs.FreeBSD.org /home/projcvs 

   CVS operations are done remotely by setting the CVSROOT
   environment variable to the appropriate host and top-level
   directory (for example, dcvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/dcvs), and doing
   the appropriate check-out/check-in operations. Many committers
   define aliases which expand to the correct cvs invocation for the
   appropriate repository. For example, a tcsh(1) user may add the
   following to their .cshrc for this purpose:

 alias dcvs cvs -d user@dcvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/dcvs
 alias pcvs cvs -d user@pcvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/pcvs
 alias projcvs cvs -d user@projcvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/projcvs

   This way they can do all CVS operations locally and use Xcvs
   commit for committing to the official CVS repository. Refer to the
   cvs(1) manual page for usage.

     Note: Please do not use cvs checkout or update with the official
     repository machine set as the CVS Root for keeping your source
     tree up to date. Remote CVS is not optimized for network
     distribution and requires a big work/administrative overhead on
     the server side. Please use our advanced cvsup distribution
     method for obtaining the repository bits, and only do the actual
     commit operation on the repository host. We provide an extensive
     cvsup replication network for this purpose, as well as give
     access to cvsup-master if you really need to stay current to the
     latest changes. cvsup-master has got the horsepower to deal with
     this, the repository master server does not. Jun Kuriyama
     <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> is in charge of cvsup-master.

   If you need to use CVS add and delete operations in a manner that
   is effectively a mv(1) operation, then a repository copy is in
   order rather than using CVS add and delete. In a repository copy,
   a repomeister will copy the file(s) to their new name and/or
   location and let you know when it is done. The purpose of a
   repository copy is to preserve file change history, or logs. We in
   the FreeBSD Project greatly value the change history that a
   version control system gives to the project.

   CVS reference information, tutorials, and FAQs can be found at:
   http://www.cvshome.org/docs/. The information in Karl Fogel's
   chapters from "Open Source Development with CVS" is also very
   useful.

   Dag-Erling C. Smo/rgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> also supplied the
   following "mini primer" for CVS.

    1. Check out a module with the co or checkout command.

 % cvs checkout shazam

       This checks out a copy of the shazam module. If there is no
       shazam module in the modules file, it looks for a top-level
       directory named shazam instead.

       Table 2. Useful cvs checkout options

       -P     Do not create empty directories                 
       -l     Check out a single level, no subdirectories     
       -rrev  Check out revision, branch or tag rev           
       -Ddate Check out the sources as they were on date date 

       Practical FreeBSD examples:

          * Check out the Tools module, which corresponds to
            ports/Tools:

 % cvs co Tools

            You now have a directory named ports/Tools with
            subdirectories portbuild, scripts, and CVS.

          * Check out the same files, but with full path:

 % cvs co ports/Tools

            You now have a directory named ports, with subdirectories
            CVS and Tools. The ports/Tools directory has
            subdirectories CVS and scripts, etc.

          * Check out the directory Tools, but none of the
            subdirectories:

 % cvs co -l Tools

            You now have a directory named Tools with just one
            subdirectory named CVS.

          * Check out the Tools module as it was when support for
            FreeBSD 5.X was dropped:

 % cvs co -rRELEASE_5_EOL Tools

            You will not be able to commit modifications, since
            RELEASE_5_EOL is a point in time, not a branch.

          * Check out the Tools module as it was on March 25th, 2009:

 % cvs co -D'2009-03-25' Tools

            You will not be able to commit modifications.

          * Check out the Tools module as it was one week ago:

 % cvs co -D'last week' Tools

            You will not be able to commit modifications.

       Note that cvs stores metadata in subdirectories named CVS.
       Similarly, Subversion stores metadata in subdirectories named
       .svn.

       Arguments to -D and -r are sticky, which means cvs will
       remember them later, e.g. when you do a cvs update.

    2. Check the status of checked-out files with the status command.

 % cvs status shazam

       This displays the status of the file shazam or of every file
       in the shazam directory. For every file, the status is given
       as one of:

       Up-to-date            File is up-to-date and            
                             unmodified.                       
                             File is unmodified, but there is  
       Needs Patch           a newer revision in the           
                             repository.                       
       Locally Modified      File is up-to-date, but modified. 
       Needs Merge           File is modified, and there is a  
                             newer revision in the repository. 
       File had conflicts on There were conflicts the last     
       merge                 time this file was updated, and   
                             they have not been resolved yet.  

       You will also see the local revision and date, the revision
       number of the newest applicable version ("newest applicable"
       because if you have a sticky date, tag or branch, it may not
       be the actual newest revision), and any sticky tags, dates or
       options.

    3. Once you have checked something out, you can update it with
       the update command.

 % cvs update shazam

       This updates the file shazam or the contents of the shazam
       directory to the latest version along the branch you checked
       out. If you checked out a "point in time", it does nothing
       unless the tags have moved in the repository or some other
       weird stuff is going on.

       Useful options, in addition to those listed above for
       checkout:

       -d     Check out any additional missing directories.    
       -A     Update to head of main branch.                   

       If you checked out a module with -r or -D, running cvs update
       with a different -r or -D argument or with -A will select a
       new branch, revision or date. The -A option clears all sticky
       tags, dates or revisions whereas -r and -D set new ones.

       Theoretically, specifying HEAD as the argument to -r will give
       you the same result as -A, but that is just theory.

       The -d option is useful if:

          * somebody has added subdirectories to the module you have
            checked out after you checked it out.

          * you checked out with -l, and later change your mind and
            want to check out the subdirectories as well.

          * you deleted some subdirectories and want to check them
            all back out.

       Watch the output of the cvs update with care. The letter in
       front of each filename indicates what was done with it:

       U The file was updated without trouble.                 
       P The file was updated without trouble (you will only   
         see this when working against a remote repository).   
       M The file had been modified, and was merged without    
         conflicts.                                            
       C The file had been modified, and was merged with       
         conflicts.                                            

       Merging is what happens if you check out a copy of some file,
       modify it, then someone else commits a change, and you run cvs
       update. CVS notices that you have made local changes, and
       tries to merge your changes with the changes between the
       version you originally checked out and the one you updated to.
       If the changes are to separate portions of the file, it will
       almost always work fine (though the result might not be
       syntactically or semantically correct).

       CVS will print an M in front of every locally modified file
       even if there is no newer version in the repository, so cvs
       update is handy for getting a summary of what you have changed
       locally.

       If you get a C, then your changes conflicted with the changes
       in the repository (the changes were to the same lines, or
       neighboring lines, or you changed the local file so much that
       cvs can not figure out how to apply the repository's changes).
       You will have to go through the file manually and resolve the
       conflicts; they will be marked with rows of <, = and > signs.
       For every conflict, there will be a marker line with seven <
       signs and the name of the file, followed by a chunk of what
       your local file contained, followed by a separator line with
       seven = signs, followed by the corresponding chunk in the
       repository version, followed by a marker line with seven >
       signs and the revision number you updated to.

    4. View differences between the local version and the repository
       version with the diff command.

 % cvs diff shazam

       shows you every modification you have made to the shazam file
       or module.

       Table 3. Useful cvs diff options

       -u Uses the unified diff format. 
       -c Uses the context diff format. 
       -N Shows missing or added files. 

       You always want to use -u, since unified diffs are much easier
       to read than almost any other diff format (in some
       circumstances, context diffs generated with the -c option may
       be better, but they are much bulkier). A unified diff consists
       of a series of hunks. Each hunk begins with a line that starts
       with two @ signs and specifies where in the file the
       differences are and how many lines they span. This is followed
       by a number of lines; some (preceded by a blank) are context;
       some (preceded by a - sign) are outtakes and some (preceded by
       a +) are additions.

       You can also diff against a different version than the one you
       checked out by specifying a version with -r or -D as in
       checkout or update, or even view the diffs between two
       arbitrary versions (without regard for what you have locally)
       by specifying two versions with -r or -D.

    5. View log entries with the log command.

 % cvs log shazam

       If shazam is a file, this will print a header with information
       about this file, such as where in the repository this file is
       stored, which revision is the HEAD for this file, what
       branches this file is in, and any tags that are valid for this
       file. Then, for each revision of this file, a log message is
       printed. This includes the date and time of the commit, who
       did the commit, how many lines were added and/or deleted, and
       finally the log message that the committer who did the change
       wrote.

       If shazam is a directory, then the log information described
       above is printed for each file in the directory in turn.
       Unless you give the -l to log, the log for all subdirectories
       of shazam is printed too, in a recursive manner.

       Use the log command to view the history of one or more files,
       as it is stored in the CVS repository. You can even use it to
       view the log message of a specific revision, if you add the
       -rrev to the log command:

 % cvs log -r1.2 shazam

       This will print only the log message for revision 1.2 of file
       shazam if it is a file, or the log message for revision 1.2 of
       each file under shazam if it is a directory.

    6. See who did what with the annotate command. This command shows
       you each line of the specified file or files, along with which
       user most recently changed that line.

 % cvs annotate shazam

    7. Add new files with the add command.

       Create the file, cvs add it, then cvs commit it.

       Similarly, you can add new directories by creating them and
       then cvs adding them. Note that you do not need to commit
       directories.

    8. Remove obsolete files with the remove command.

       Remove the file, then cvs rm it, then cvs commit it.

    9. Commit with the commit or checkin command.

       Table 4. Useful cvs commit options

       -f    Force a commit of an unmodified file.                    
       -mmsg Specify a commit message on the command line rather than 
             invoking an editor.                                      

       The following are some Subversion examples related to the src
       repository. More (in-depth) information can be found at
       Subversion Primer and List of things missing in Subversion
       when compared to CVS. The notes at
       http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/svn_notes.txt might also be
       useful. Subversion is also described in-depth in Version
       Control with Subversion.

          * Check out the head branch:

 % svn co svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src

       Good commit messages are important. They tell others why you
       did the changes you did, not just right here and now, but
       months or years from now when someone wonders why some
       seemingly illogical or inefficient piece of code sneaked into
       your source file. It is also an invaluable aid to deciding
       which changes to MFC and which not to MFC.

       Commit messages should be clear, concise and provide a
       reasonable summary to give an indication of what was changed
       and why.

       Commit messages should provide enough information to enable a
       third party to decide if the change is relevant to them and if
       they need to read the change itself.

       Avoid committing several unrelated changes in one go. It makes
       merging difficult, and also makes it harder to determine which
       change is the culprit if a bug crops up.

       Avoid committing style or whitespace fixes and functionality
       fixes in one go. It makes merging difficult, and also makes it
       harder to understand just what functional changes were made.
       In the case of documentation files, it can make the job of the
       translation teams more complicated, as it becomes difficult
       for them to determine exactly what content changes need to be
       translated.

       Avoid committing changes to multiple files in one go with a
       generic, vague message. Instead, commit each file (or small,
       related groups of files) with tailored commit messages.

       Before committing, always:

          * verify which branch you are committing to, using svn
            status. This is only needed for the src tree, as the
            other trees are not branched.

          * review your diffs, using the diff command of the version
            control system.

       Also, ALWAYS specify which files to commit explicitly on the
       command line, so you do not accidentally commit other files
       than the ones you intended -- a commit operation without any
       arguments usually will commit every modification in your
       current working directory and every subdirectory.

   Additional tips and tricks:

    1. You can place commonly used options in your ~/.cvsrc, like
       this:

 cvs -z3
 diff -Nu
 update -Pd
 checkout -P

       This example says:

          * always use compression level 3 when talking to a remote
            server. This is a life-saver when working over a slow
            connection.

          * always use the -N (show added or removed files) and -u
            (unified diff format) options to diff(1).

          * always use the -P (prune empty directories) and -d (check
            out new directories) options when updating.

          * always use the -P (prune empty directories) option when
            checking out.

    2. Use Eivind Eklund's cdiff script to view unidiffs. It is a
       wrapper for less(1) that adds ANSI color codes to make hunk
       headers, outtakes and additions stand out; context and garbage
       are unmodified. It also expands tabs properly (tabs often look
       wrong in diffs because of the extra character in front of each
       line).

       textproc/cdiff

       Simply use it instead of more(1) or less(1):

 % cvs diff -Nu shazam | cdiff

       Alternatively some editors like vim(1) (editors/vim) have
       color support and when used as a pager with color syntax
       highlighting switched on will highlight many types of file,
       including diffs, patches, and CVS/RCS logs.

 % echo "syn on" >> ~/.vimrc
 % cvs diff -Nu shazam | vim -
 % cvs log shazam | vim -

    3. CVS is old, arcane, crufty and buggy, and sometimes exhibits
       non-deterministic behavior which some claim as proof that it
       is actually merely the Newtonian manifestation of a sentient
       transdimensional entity. It is not humanly possible to know
       its every quirk inside out, so do not be afraid to ask the
       resident AI (CVS Repository Meisters <cvsadm@FreeBSD.org>) for
       help.

    4. Do not leave the cvs commit command in commit message editing
       mode for too long (more than 2-3 minutes). It locks the
       directory you are working with and will prevent other
       developers from committing into the same directory. If you
       have to type a long commit message, type it before executing
       cvs commit and insert it into the commit message or save it in
       a file before committing and use the -F option of CVS to read
       the commit message from that file, i.e.

 % vi logmsg
 % cvs ci -F logmsg shazam

       This is the fastest way of passing a commit message to CVS but
       you should be careful when editing the logmsg file before the
       commit, because CVS will not give you a chance to edit the
       message when you do the actual commit.

    5. Speed up your CVS operation considerably by using a persistent
       ssh connection to the repository machine. First, put this
       configuration into your ~/.ssh/config:

 Host dcvs.FreeBSD.org
       ControlPath /home/user/.ssh/cvs.cpath
 Host projcvs.FreeBSD.org
       ControlPath /home/user/.ssh/cvs.cpath
 Host pcvs.FreeBSD.org
       ControlPath /home/user/.ssh/cvs.cpath

       Now open the persistent connection to the repoman:

 % ssh -fNM ncvs.FreeBSD.org

       The CVS commands should now respond faster, as they are
       reusing existing connection with the repository. Note that all
       the hostnames are case sensitive.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

4 Conventions and Traditions

   As a new developer there are a number of things you should do
   first. The first set is specific to committers only.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  4.1 Guidelines For Committers

   If you have been given commit rights to one or more of the
   repositories:

     * Add your author entity to
       doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/share/sgml/authors.ent; this should be
       done first since an omission of this commit will cause the
       next commits to break the doc/ build.

       This is a relatively easy task, but remains a good first test
       of your CVS skills.

     * Also add your author entity to www/en/developers.sgml.

     * Add yourself to the "Developers" section of the Contributors
       List
       (doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.committers.sgml)
       and remove yourself from the "Additional Contributors" section
       (doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml).

     * Add an entry for yourself to www/share/sgml/news.xml. Look for
       the other entries that look like "A new committer" and follow
       the format.

     * You should add your PGP or GnuPG key to doc/share/pgpkeys (and
       if you do not have a key, you should create one). Do not
       forget to commit the updated doc/share/pgpkeys/pgpkeys.ent and
       doc/share/pgpkeys/pgpkeys-developers.sgml.

       Dag-Erling C. Smo/rgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> has written a shell
       script (doc/share/pgpkeys/addkey.sh) to make this extremely
       simple. See the README file for more information.

         Note: It is important to have an up-to-date PGP/GnuPG key in
         the Handbook, since the key may be required for positive
         identification of a committer, e.g. by the FreeBSD
         Administrators <admins@FreeBSD.org> for account recovery. A
         complete keyring of FreeBSD.org users is available for
         download from http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/pgpkeyring.txt.

     * Add an entry for yourself to
       src/share/misc/committers-repository.dot, where repository is
       either doc, ports or src, depending on the commit privileges
       you obtained.

     * Some people add an entry for themselves to
       ports/astro/xearth/files/freebsd.committers.markers.

     * Some people add an entry for themselves to
       src/usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.freebsd.

     * If you already have an account at the FreeBSD wiki, make sure
       your mentor moves you from the Contributors group to the
       Developers group. Otherwise, consider signing up for an
       account so you can publish projects and ideas you are working
       on.

     * If you subscribe to svn-src-all or the FreeBSD CVS commit
       message mailing list, you will probably want to unsubscribe to
       avoid receiving duplicate copies of commit messages and their
       followups.

   All src commits should go to FreeBSD-CURRENT first before being
   merged to FreeBSD-STABLE. No major new features or high-risk
   modifications should be made to the FreeBSD-STABLE branch.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  4.2 Guidelines For Everyone

   Whether or not you have commit rights:

     * Introduce yourself to the other developers, otherwise no one
       will have any idea who you are or what you are working on. You
       do not have to write a comprehensive biography, just write a
       paragraph or two about who you are and what you plan to be
       working on as a developer in FreeBSD. (You should also mention
       who your mentor will be). Email this to the FreeBSD developers
       mailing list and you will be on your way!

     * Log into hub.FreeBSD.org and create a /var/forward/user (where
       user is your username) file containing the e-mail address
       where you want mail addressed to yourusername@FreeBSD.org to
       be forwarded. This includes all of the commit messages as well
       as any other mail addressed to the FreeBSD committer's mailing
       list and the FreeBSD developers mailing list. Really large
       mailboxes which have taken up permanent residence on hub often
       get "accidentally" truncated without warning, so forward it or
       read it and you will not lose it.

       Due to the severe load dealing with SPAM places on the central
       mail servers that do the mailing list processing the front-end
       server does do some basic checks and will drop some messages
       based on these checks. At the moment proper DNS information
       for the connecting host is the only check in place but that
       may change. Some people blame these checks for bouncing valid
       email. If you want these checks turned off for your email you
       can place a file named .spam_lover in your home directory on
       freefall.FreeBSD.org to disable the checks for your email.

     Note: If you are a developer but not a committer, you will not
     be subscribed to the committers or developers mailing lists; the
     subscriptions are derived from the access rights.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  4.3 Mentors

   All new developers also have a mentor assigned to them for the
   first few months. Your mentor is responsible for teaching you the
   rules and conventions of the project and guiding your first steps
   in the developer community. Your mentor is also personally
   responsible for your actions during this initial period.

   For committers: until your mentor decides (and announces with a
   forced commit to access) that you have learned the ropes and are
   ready to commit on your own, you should not commit anything
   without first getting your mentor's review and approval, and you
   should document that approval with an Approved by: line in the
   commit message.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

5 Preferred License for New Files

   Currently the FreeBSD Project suggests and uses the following text
   as the preferred license scheme:

 /*-
  * Copyright (c) [year] [your name]
  * All rights reserved.
  *
  * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
  * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
  * are met:
  * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
  * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
  *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
  *
  * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
  * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
  * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
  * ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
  * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
  * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
  * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
  * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
  * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
  * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
  * SUCH DAMAGE.
  *
  * [id for your version control system, if any]
  */

   The FreeBSD project strongly discourages the so-called
   "advertising clause" in new code. Due to the large number of
   contributors to the FreeBSD project, complying with this clause
   for many commercial vendors has become difficult. If you have code
   in the tree with the advertising clause, please consider removing
   it. In fact, please consider using the above license for your
   code.

   The FreeBSD project discourages completely new licenses and
   variations on the standard licenses. New licenses require the
   approval of <core@FreeBSD.org> to reside in the main repository.
   The more different licenses that are used in the tree, the more
   problems that this causes to those wishing to utilize this code,
   typically from unintended consequences from a poorly worded
   license.

   Project policy dictates that code under some non-BSD licenses must
   be placed only in specific sections of the repository, and in some
   cases, compilation must be conditional or even disabled by
   default. For example, the GENERIC kernel must be compiled under
   only licenses identical to or substantially similar to the BSD
   license. GPL, APSL, CDDL, etc, licensed software must not be
   compiled into GENERIC.

   Developers are reminded that in open source, getting "open" right
   is just as important as getting "source" right, as improper
   handling of intellectual property has serious consequences. Any
   questions or concerns should immediately be brought to the
   attention of the core team.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

6 Developer Relations

   If you are working directly on your own code or on code which is
   already well established as your responsibility, then there is
   probably little need to check with other committers before jumping
   in with a commit. If you see a bug in an area of the system which
   is clearly orphaned (and there are a few such areas, to our
   shame), the same applies. If, however, you are about to modify
   something which is clearly being actively maintained by someone
   else (and it is only by watching the repository-committers mailing
   list that you can really get a feel for just what is and is not)
   then consider sending the change to them instead, just as you
   would have before becoming a committer. For ports, you should
   contact the listed MAINTAINER in the Makefile. For other parts of
   the repository, if you are unsure who the active maintainer might
   be, it may help to scan the revision history to see who has
   committed changes in the past. Bill Fenner <fenner@FreeBSD.org>
   has written a nice shell script that can help determine who the
   active maintainer might be. It lists each person who has committed
   to a given file along with the number of commits each person has
   made. It can be found on freefall at ~fenner/bin/whodid. If your
   queries go unanswered or the committer otherwise indicates a lack
   of interest in the area affected, go ahead and commit it.

   If you are unsure about a commit for any reason at all, have it
   reviewed by -hackers before committing. Better to have it flamed
   then and there rather than when it is part of the repository. If
   you do happen to commit something which results in controversy
   erupting, you may also wish to consider backing the change out
   again until the matter is settled. Remember - with a version
   control system we can always change it back.

   Do not impugn the intentions of someone you disagree with. If they
   see a different solution to a problem than you, or even a
   different problem, it is not because they are stupid, because they
   have questionable parentage, or because they are trying to destroy
   your hard work, personal image, or FreeBSD, but simply because
   they have a different outlook on the world. Different is good.

   Disagree honestly. Argue your position from its merits, be honest
   about any shortcomings it may have, and be open to seeing their
   solution, or even their vision of the problem, with an open mind.

   Accept correction. We are all fallible. When you have made a
   mistake, apologize and get on with life. Do not beat up yourself,
   and certainly do not beat up others for your mistake. Do not waste
   time on embarrassment or recrimination, just fix the problem and
   move on.

   Ask for help. Seek out (and give) peer reviews. One of the ways
   open source software is supposed to excel is in the number of
   eyeballs applied to it; this does not apply if nobody will review
   code.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

7 GNATS

   The FreeBSD Project utilizes GNATS for tracking bugs and change
   requests. Be sure that if you commit a fix or suggestion found in
   a GNATS PR, you use edit-pr pr-number on freefall to close it. It
   is also considered nice if you take time to close any PRs
   associated with your commits, if appropriate. You can also make
   use of send-pr(1) yourself for proposing any change which you feel
   should probably be made, pending a more extensive peer-review
   first.

   You can find out more about GNATS at:

     * FreeBSD Problem Report Handling Guidelines

     * http://www.cs.utah.edu/csinfo/texinfo/gnats/gnats.html

     * http://www.FreeBSD.org/support.html

     * send-pr(1)

   You can run a local copy of GNATS, and then integrate the FreeBSD
   GNATS tree in to it using CVSup. Then you can run GNATS commands
   locally. This lets you query the PR database without needing to be
   connected to the Internet.

   Using a local GNATS tree

    1. If you are not already downloading the GNATS tree, add this
       line to your supfile, and re-sup. Note that since GNATS is not
       under CVS control it has no tag, so if you are adding it to
       your existing supfile it should appear before any "tag=" entry
       as these remain active once set.

 gnats release=current prefix=/usr

       This will place the FreeBSD GNATS tree in /usr/gnats. You can
       use a refuse file to control which categories to receive. For
       example, to only receive docs PRs, put this line in
       /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/refuse[1].

 gnats/[a-ce-z]*

       The rest of these examples assume you have only supped the
       docs category. Adjust them as necessary, depending on the
       categories you are syncing.

    2. Install the GNATS port from ports/databases/gnats. This will
       place the various GNATS directories under $PREFIX/share/gnats.

    3. Symlink the GNATS directories you are supping under the
       version of GNATS you have installed.

 # cd /usr/local/share/gnats/gnats-db
 # ln -s /usr/gnats/docs

       Repeat as necessary, depending on how many GNATS categories
       you are syncing.

    4. Update the GNATS categories file with these categories. The
       file is $PREFIX/share/gnats/gnats-db/gnats-adm/categories.

 # This category is mandatory
 pending:Category for faulty PRs:gnats-admin:
 #
 # FreeBSD categories
 #
 docs:Documentation Bug:freebsd-doc:

    5. Run $PREFIX/libexec/gnats/gen-index to recreate the GNATS
       index. The output has to be redirected to
       $PREFIX/share/gnats/gnats-db/gnats-adm/index. You can do this
       periodically from cron(8), or run cvsup(1) from a shell script
       that does this as well.

 # /usr/local/libexec/gnats/gen-index \
         > /usr/local/share/gnats/gnats-db/gnats-adm/index

    6. Test the configuration by querying the PR database. This
       command shows open docs PRs.

 # query-pr -c docs -s open

    7. Pick a PR and close it.

     Note: This procedure only works to allow you to view and query
     the PRs locally. To edit or close them you will still have to
     log in to freefall and do it from there.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

8 Who's Who

   Besides the repository meisters, there are other FreeBSD project
   members and teams whom you will probably get to know in your role
   as a committer. Briefly, and by no means all-inclusively, these
   are:

   John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>

           John is the manager of the SMPng Project, and has
           authority over the architectural design and implementation
           of the move to fine-grained kernel threading and locking.
           He is also the editor of the SMPng Architecture Document.
           If you are working on fine-grained SMP and locking, please
           coordinate with John. You can learn more about the SMPng
           Project on its home page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/smp/

   Documentation Engineering Team <doceng@FreeBSD.org>

           doceng is the group responsible for the documentation
           build infrastructure, approving new documentation
           committers, and ensuring that the FreeBSD website and
           documentation on the FTP site is up to date with respect
           to the CVS tree. It is not a conflict resolution body. The
           vast majority of documentation related discussion takes
           place on the FreeBSD documentation project mailing list.
           More details regarding the doceng team can be found in its
           charter. Committers interested in contributing to the
           documentation should familiarize themselves with the
           Documentation Project Primer.

   Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>

           Ruslan is Mister mdoc(7). If you are writing a manual page
           and need some advice on the structure, or the markup, ask
           Ruslan.

   Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>

           Bruce is the Style Police-Meister. When you do a commit
           that could have been done better, Bruce will be there to
           tell you. Be thankful that someone is. Bruce is also very
           knowledgeable on the various standards applicable to
           FreeBSD.

   Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>, Doug White
   <dwhite@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Ken
   Smith <kensmith@FreeBSD.org>, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>,
   Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>, Bruce A. Mah <bmah@FreeBSD.org>

           These are the members of the Release Engineering Team
           <re@FreeBSD.org>. This team is responsible for setting
           release deadlines and controlling the release process.
           During code freezes, the release engineers have final
           authority on all changes to the system for whichever
           branch is pending release status. If there is something
           you want merged from FreeBSD-CURRENT to FreeBSD-STABLE
           (whatever values those may have at any given time), these
           are the people to talk to about it.

           Hiroki is also the keeper of the release documentation
           (src/release/doc/*). If you commit a change that you think
           is worthy of mention in the release notes, please make
           sure he knows about it. Better still, send him a patch
           with your suggested commentary.

   Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org>

           Colin is the FreeBSD Security Officer and oversees the
           Security Officer Team <security-officer@FreeBSD.org>.

   Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.org>

           If you need advice on obscure network internals or are not
           sure of some potential change to the networking subsystem
           you have in mind, Garrett is someone to talk to. Garrett
           is also very knowledgeable on the various standards
           applicable to FreeBSD.

   FreeBSD committer's mailing list

           cvs-committers is the entity that the version control
           system uses to send you all your commit messages. You
           should never send email directly to this list. You should
           only send replies to this list when they are short and are
           directly related to a commit.

           There is a similar list, svn-committers, which has a
           similar purpose but is a normal list, i.e. you are free to
           send any suitable message to this list.

   FreeBSD developers mailing list

           All committers are subscribed to -developers. This list
           was created to be a forum for the committers "community"
           issues. Examples are Core voting, announcements, etc.

           The FreeBSD developers mailing list is for the exclusive
           use of FreeBSD committers. In order to develop FreeBSD,
           committers must have the ability to openly discuss matters
           that will be resolved before they are publicly announced.
           Frank discussions of work in progress are not suitable for
           open publication and may harm FreeBSD.

           All FreeBSD committers are reminded to obey the copyright
           of the original author(s) of FreeBSD developers mailing
           list mail. Do not publish or forward messages from the
           FreeBSD developers mailing list outside the list
           membership without permission of all of the authors.

           Copyright violators will be removed from the FreeBSD
           developers mailing list, resulting in a suspension of
           commit privileges. Repeated or flagrant violations may
           result in permanent revocation of commit privileges.

           This list is not intended as a place for code reviews or a
           replacement for the FreeBSD architecture and design
           mailing list or the FreeBSD source code audit mailing
           list. In fact using it as such hurts the FreeBSD Project
           as it gives a sense of a closed list where general
           decisions affecting all of the FreeBSD using community are
           made without being "open". Last, but not least never,
           never ever, email the FreeBSD developers mailing list and
           CC:/BCC: another FreeBSD list. Never, ever email another
           FreeBSD email list and CC:/BCC: the FreeBSD developers
           mailing list. Doing so can greatly diminish the benefits
           of this list.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

9 SSH Quick-Start Guide

    1. If you do not wish to type your password in every time you use
       ssh(1), and you use RSA or DSA keys to authenticate,
       ssh-agent(1) is there for your convenience. If you want to use
       ssh-agent(1), make sure that you run it before running other
       applications. X users, for example, usually do this from their
       .xsession or .xinitrc file. See ssh-agent(1) for details.

    2. Generate a key pair using ssh-keygen(1). The key pair will
       wind up in your $HOME/.ssh/ directory.

    3. Send your public key ($HOME/.ssh/id_dsa.pub or
       $HOME/.ssh/id_rsa.pub) to the person setting you up as a
       committer so it can be put into the yourlogin file in
       /etc/ssh-keys/ on freefall.

   Now you should be able to use ssh-add(1) for authentication once
   per session. This will prompt you for your private key's pass
   phrase, and then store it in your authentication agent
   (ssh-agent(1)). If you no longer wish to have your key stored in
   the agent, issuing ssh-add -d will remove it.

   Test by doing something such as ssh freefall.FreeBSD.org ls /usr.

   For more information, see security/openssh, ssh(1), ssh-add(1),
   ssh-agent(1), ssh-keygen(1), and scp(1).

     --------------------------------------------------------------

10 Coverity Prevent(R) Availability for FreeBSD Committers

   In January 2006, the FreeBSD Foundation obtained a license for
   Coverity Prevent(R) from Coverity(R) Ltd. With this donation, all
   FreeBSD developers can obtain access to Coverity Prevent analysis
   results of all FreeBSD Project software.

   FreeBSD developers who are interested in obtaining access to the
   analysis results of the automated Coverity Prevent runs, can find
   out more by logging into freefall and reading the relevant bits of
   the files:

   /usr/local/coverity/coverity_license.txt

           The license terms to which the FreeBSD developers will
           have to agree in order to use Coverity Prevent analysis
           results.

   /usr/local/coverity/coverity_announcement.txt

           The announcement posted to the developers' mailing list of
           the FreeBSD Project. It contains useful information about
           the FreeBSD Foundation and Coverity Ltd., as well as
           signup information for registering with the Coverity
           Prevent installation of the FreeBSD Cluster.

           After reading and understanding the license terms of
           coverity_license.txt, all FreeBSD developers who are
           interested in using the analysis results of Coverity
           Prevent should read this file.

   /usr/local/coverity/coverity_readme.txt

           A short guide about fixes which are committed to the
           FreeBSD source tree after being detected by Coverity
           Prevent and analyzed by an FreeBSD developer.

   The FreeBSD Wiki includes a mini-guide for developers who are
   interested in working with the Coverity Prevent analysis reports:
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/CoverityPrevent. Please note that this
   mini-guide is only readable by FreeBSD developers, so if you
   cannot access this page, you will have to ask someone to add you
   to the appropriate Wiki access list.

   Finally, all FreeBSD developers who are going to use Coverity
   Prevent are always encouraged to ask for more details and usage
   information, by posting any questions to the mailing list of the
   FreeBSD developers.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

11 The FreeBSD Committers' Big List of Rules

    1. Respect other committers.

    2. Respect other contributors.

    3. Discuss any significant change before committing.

    4. Respect existing maintainers (if listed in the MAINTAINER
       field in Makefile or in the MAINTAINER file in the top-level
       directory).

    5. Any disputed change must be backed out pending resolution of
       the dispute if requested by a maintainer. Security related
       changes may override a maintainer's wishes at the Security
       Officer's discretion.

    6. Changes go to FreeBSD-CURRENT before FreeBSD-STABLE unless
       specifically permitted by the release engineer or unless they
       are not applicable to FreeBSD-CURRENT. Any non-trivial or
       non-urgent change which is applicable should also be allowed
       to sit in FreeBSD-CURRENT for at least 3 days before merging
       so that it can be given sufficient testing. The release
       engineer has the same authority over the FreeBSD-STABLE branch
       as outlined for the maintainer in rule #5.

    7. Do not fight in public with other committers; it looks bad. If
       you must "strongly disagree" about something, do so only in
       private.

    8. Respect all code freezes and read the committers and
       developers mailing lists in a timely manner so you know when a
       code freeze is in effect.

    9. When in doubt on any procedure, ask first!

   10. Test your changes before committing them.

   11. Do not commit to anything under the src/contrib, src/crypto,
       or src/sys/contrib trees without explicit approval from the
       respective maintainer(s).

   As noted, breaking some of these rules can be grounds for
   suspension or, upon repeated offense, permanent removal of commit
   privileges. Individual members of core have the power to
   temporarily suspend commit privileges until core as a whole has
   the chance to review the issue. In case of an "emergency" (a
   committer doing damage to the repository), a temporary suspension
   may also be done by the repository meisters. Only a 2/3 majority
   of core has the authority to suspend commit privileges for longer
   than a week or to remove them permanently. This rule does not
   exist to set core up as a bunch of cruel dictators who can dispose
   of committers as casually as empty soda cans, but to give the
   project a kind of safety fuse. If someone is out of control, it is
   important to be able to deal with this immediately rather than be
   paralyzed by debate. In all cases, a committer whose privileges
   are suspended or revoked is entitled to a "hearing" by core, the
   total duration of the suspension being determined at that time. A
   committer whose privileges are suspended may also request a review
   of the decision after 30 days and every 30 days thereafter (unless
   the total suspension period is less than 30 days). A committer
   whose privileges have been revoked entirely may request a review
   after a period of 6 months has elapsed. This review policy is
   strictly informal and, in all cases, core reserves the right to
   either act on or disregard requests for review if they feel their
   original decision to be the right one.

   In all other aspects of project operation, core is a subset of
   committers and is bound by the same rules. Just because someone is
   in core this does not mean that they have special dispensation to
   step outside any of the lines painted here; core's "special
   powers" only kick in when it acts as a group, not on an individual
   basis. As individuals, the core team members are all committers
   first and core second.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  11.1 Details

    1. Respect other committers.

       This means that you need to treat other committers as the
       peer-group developers that they are. Despite our occasional
       attempts to prove the contrary, one does not get to be a
       committer by being stupid and nothing rankles more than being
       treated that way by one of your peers. Whether we always feel
       respect for one another or not (and everyone has off days), we
       still have to treat other committers with respect at all
       times, on public forums and in private email.

       Being able to work together long term is this project's
       greatest asset, one far more important than any set of changes
       to the code, and turning arguments about code into issues that
       affect our long-term ability to work harmoniously together is
       just not worth the trade-off by any conceivable stretch of the
       imagination.

       To comply with this rule, do not send email when you are angry
       or otherwise behave in a manner which is likely to strike
       others as needlessly confrontational. First calm down, then
       think about how to communicate in the most effective fashion
       for convincing the other person(s) that your side of the
       argument is correct, do not just blow off some steam so you
       can feel better in the short term at the cost of a long-term
       flame war. Not only is this very bad "energy economics", but
       repeated displays of public aggression which impair our
       ability to work well together will be dealt with severely by
       the project leadership and may result in suspension or
       termination of your commit privileges. The project leadership
       will take into account both public and private communications
       brought before it. It will not seek the disclosure of private
       communications, but it will take it into account if it is
       volunteered by the committers involved in the complaint.

       All of this is never an option which the project's leadership
       enjoys in the slightest, but unity comes first. No amount of
       code or good advice is worth trading that away.

    2. Respect other contributors.

       You were not always a committer. At one time you were a
       contributor. Remember that at all times. Remember what it was
       like trying to get help and attention. Do not forget that your
       work as a contributor was very important to you. Remember what
       it was like. Do not discourage, belittle, or demean
       contributors. Treat them with respect. They are our committers
       in waiting. They are every bit as important to the project as
       committers. Their contributions are as valid and as important
       as your own. After all, you made many contributions before you
       became a committer. Always remember that.

       Consider the points raised under 1 and apply them also to
       contributors.

    3. Discuss any significant change before committing.

       The repository is not where changes should be initially
       submitted for correctness or argued over, that should happen
       first in the mailing lists and the commit should only happen
       once something resembling consensus has been reached. This
       does not mean that you have to ask permission before
       correcting every obvious syntax error or manual page
       misspelling, simply that you should try to develop a feel for
       when a proposed change is not quite such a no-brainer and
       requires some feedback first. People really do not mind
       sweeping changes if the result is something clearly better
       than what they had before, they just do not like being
       surprised by those changes. The very best way of making sure
       that you are on the right track is to have your code reviewed
       by one or more other committers.

       When in doubt, ask for review!

    4. Respect existing maintainers if listed.

       Many parts of FreeBSD are not "owned" in the sense that any
       specific individual will jump up and yell if you commit a
       change to "their" area, but it still pays to check first. One
       convention we use is to put a maintainer line in the Makefile
       for any package or subtree which is being actively maintained
       by one or more people; see
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/policies.html
       for documentation on this. Where sections of code have several
       maintainers, commits to affected areas by one maintainer need
       to be reviewed by at least one other maintainer. In cases
       where the "maintainer-ship" of something is not clear, you can
       also look at the repository logs for the file(s) in question
       and see if someone has been working recently or predominantly
       in that area.

       Other areas of FreeBSD fall under the control of someone who
       manages an overall category of FreeBSD evolution, such as
       internationalization or networking. See
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/administration.html for more
       information on this.

    5. Any disputed change must be backed out pending resolution of
       the dispute if requested by a maintainer. Security related
       changes may override a maintainer's wishes at the Security
       Officer's discretion.

       This may be hard to swallow in times of conflict (when each
       side is convinced that they are in the right, of course) but a
       version control system makes it unnecessary to have an ongoing
       dispute raging when it is far easier to simply reverse the
       disputed change, get everyone calmed down again and then try
       to figure out what is the best way to proceed. If the change
       turns out to be the best thing after all, it can be easily
       brought back. If it turns out not to be, then the users did
       not have to live with the bogus change in the tree while
       everyone was busily debating its merits. People very rarely
       call for back-outs in the repository since discussion
       generally exposes bad or controversial changes before the
       commit even happens, but on such rare occasions the back-out
       should be done without argument so that we can get immediately
       on to the topic of figuring out whether it was bogus or not.

    6. Changes go to FreeBSD-CURRENT before FreeBSD-STABLE unless
       specifically permitted by the release engineer or unless they
       are not applicable to FreeBSD-CURRENT. Any non-trivial or
       non-urgent change which is applicable should also be allowed
       to sit in FreeBSD-CURRENT for at least 3 days before merging
       so that it can be given sufficient testing. The release
       engineer has the same authority over the FreeBSD-STABLE branch
       as outlined in rule #5.

       This is another "do not argue about it" issue since it is the
       release engineer who is ultimately responsible (and gets
       beaten up) if a change turns out to be bad. Please respect
       this and give the release engineer your full cooperation when
       it comes to the FreeBSD-STABLE branch. The management of
       FreeBSD-STABLE may frequently seem to be overly conservative
       to the casual observer, but also bear in mind the fact that
       conservatism is supposed to be the hallmark of FreeBSD-STABLE
       and different rules apply there than in FreeBSD-CURRENT. There
       is also really no point in having FreeBSD-CURRENT be a testing
       ground if changes are merged over to FreeBSD-STABLE
       immediately. Changes need a chance to be tested by the
       FreeBSD-CURRENT developers, so allow some time to elapse
       before merging unless the FreeBSD-STABLE fix is critical, time
       sensitive or so obvious as to make further testing unnecessary
       (spelling fixes to manual pages, obvious bug/typo fixes, etc.)
       In other words, apply common sense.

       Changes to the security branches (for example, RELENG_6_0)
       must be approved by a member of the Security Officer Team
       <security-officer@FreeBSD.org>, or in some cases, by a member
       of the Release Engineering Team <re@FreeBSD.org>.

    7. Do not fight in public with other committers; it looks bad. If
       you must "strongly disagree" about something, do so only in
       private.

       This project has a public image to uphold and that image is
       very important to all of us, especially if we are to continue
       to attract new members. There will be occasions when, despite
       everyone's very best attempts at self-control, tempers are
       lost and angry words are exchanged. The best thing that can be
       done in such cases is to minimize the effects of this until
       everyone has cooled back down. That means that you should not
       air your angry words in public and you should not forward
       private correspondence to public mailing lists or aliases.
       What people say one-to-one is often much less sugar-coated
       than what they would say in public, and such communications
       therefore have no place there - they only serve to inflame an
       already bad situation. If the person sending you a
       flame-o-gram at least had the grace to send it privately, then
       have the grace to keep it private yourself. If you feel you
       are being unfairly treated by another developer, and it is
       causing you anguish, bring the matter up with core rather than
       taking it public. Core will do its best to play peace makers
       and get things back to sanity. In cases where the dispute
       involves a change to the codebase and the participants do not
       appear to be reaching an amicable agreement, core may appoint
       a mutually-agreeable 3rd party to resolve the dispute. All
       parties involved must then agree to be bound by the decision
       reached by this 3rd party.

    8. Respect all code freezes and read the committers and
       developers mailing list on a timely basis so you know when a
       code freeze is in effect.

       Committing unapproved changes during a code freeze is a really
       big mistake and committers are expected to keep up-to-date on
       what is going on before jumping in after a long absence and
       committing 10 megabytes worth of accumulated stuff. People who
       abuse this on a regular basis will have their commit
       privileges suspended until they get back from the FreeBSD
       Happy Reeducation Camp we run in Greenland.

    9. When in doubt on any procedure, ask first!

       Many mistakes are made because someone is in a hurry and just
       assumes they know the right way of doing something. If you
       have not done it before, chances are good that you do not
       actually know the way we do things and really need to ask
       first or you are going to completely embarrass yourself in
       public. There is no shame in asking "how in the heck do I do
       this?" We already know you are an intelligent person;
       otherwise, you would not be a committer.

   10. Test your changes before committing them.

       This may sound obvious, but if it really were so obvious then
       we probably would not see so many cases of people clearly not
       doing this. If your changes are to the kernel, make sure you
       can still compile both GENERIC and LINT. If your changes are
       anywhere else, make sure you can still make world. If your
       changes are to a branch, make sure your testing occurs with a
       machine which is running that code. If you have a change which
       also may break another architecture, be sure and test on all
       supported architectures. Please refer to the FreeBSD Internal
       Page for a list of available resources. As other architectures
       are added to the FreeBSD supported platforms list, the
       appropriate shared testing resources will be made available.

   11. Do not commit to anything under the src/contrib, src/crypto,
       and src/sys/contrib trees without explicit approval from the
       respective maintainer(s).

       The trees mentioned above are for contributed software usually
       imported onto a vendor branch. Committing something there,
       even if it does not take the file off the vendor branch, may
       cause unnecessary headaches for those responsible for
       maintaining that particular piece of software. Thus, unless
       you have explicit approval from the maintainer (or you are the
       maintainer), do not commit there!

       Please note that this does not mean you should not try to
       improve the software in question; you are still more than
       welcome to do so. Ideally, you should submit your patches to
       the vendor. If your changes are FreeBSD-specific, talk to the
       maintainer; they may be willing to apply them locally. But
       whatever you do, do not commit there by yourself!

       Contact the FreeBSD core team if you wish to take up
       maintainership of an unmaintained part of the tree.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  11.2 Policy on Multiple Architectures

   FreeBSD has added several new architecture ports during recent
   release cycles and is truly no longer an i386(TM) centric
   operating system. In an effort to make it easier to keep FreeBSD
   portable across the platforms we support, core has developed the
   following mandate:

     Our 32-bit reference platform is i386, and our 64-bit reference
     platform is Sparc64. Major design work (including major API and
     ABI changes) must prove itself on at least one 32-bit and at
     least one 64-bit platform, preferably the primary reference
     platforms, before it may be committed to the source tree.

   The i386 and Sparc64 platforms were chosen due to being more
   readily available to developers and as representatives of more
   diverse processor and system designs - big vs little endian,
   register file vs register stack, different DMA and cache
   implementations, hardware page tables vs software TLB management
   etc.

   The ia64 platform has many of the same complications that Sparc64
   has, but is still limited in availability to developers.

   We will continue to re-evaluate this policy as cost and
   availability of the 64-bit platforms change.

   Developers should also be aware of our Tier Policy for the long
   term support of hardware architectures. The rules here are
   intended to provide guidance during the development process, and
   are distinct from the requirements for features and architectures
   listed in that section. The Tier rules for feature support on
   architectures at release-time are more strict than the rules for
   changes during the development process.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  11.3 Other Suggestions

   When committing documentation changes, use a spell checker before
   committing. For all SGML docs, you should also verify that your
   formatting directives are correct by running make lint.

   For all on-line manual pages, run manck (from ports) over the
   manual page to verify all of the cross references and file
   references are correct and that the man page has all of the
   appropriate MLINKs installed.

   Do not mix style fixes with new functionality. A style fix is any
   change which does not modify the functionality of the code. Mixing
   the changes obfuscates the functionality change when asking for
   differences between revisions, which can hide any new bugs. Do not
   include whitespace changes with content changes in commits to doc/
   or www/. The extra clutter in the diffs makes the translators' job
   much more difficult. Instead, make any style or whitespace changes
   in separate commits that are clearly labeled as such in the commit
   message.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  11.4 Deprecating Features

   When it is necessary to remove functionality from software in the
   base system the following guidelines should be followed whenever
   possible:

    1. Mention is made in the manual page and possibly the release
       notes that the option, utility, or interface is deprecated.
       Use of the deprecated feature generates a warning.

    2. The option, utility, or interface is preserved until the next
       major (point zero) release.

    3. The option, utility, or interface is removed and no longer
       documented. It is now obsolete. It is also generally a good
       idea to note its removal in the release notes.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

12 Support for Multiple Architectures

   FreeBSD is a highly portable operating system intended to function
   on many different types of hardware architectures. Maintaining
   clean separation of Machine Dependent (MD) and Machine Independent
   (MI) code, as well as minimizing MD code, is an important part of
   our strategy to remain agile with regards to current hardware
   trends. Each new hardware architecture supported by FreeBSD adds
   substantially to the cost of code maintenance, toolchain support,
   and release engineering. It also dramatically increases the cost
   of effective testing of kernel changes. As such, there is strong
   motivation to differentiate between classes of support for various
   architectures while remaining strong in a few key architectures
   that are seen as the FreeBSD "target audience".

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.1 Statement of General Intent

   The FreeBSD Project targets "production quality commercial
   off-the-shelf (COTS) workstation, server, and high-end embedded
   systems". By retaining a focus on a narrow set of architectures of
   interest in these environments, the FreeBSD Project is able to
   maintain high levels of quality, stability, and performance, as
   well as minimize the load on various support teams on the project,
   such as the ports team, documentation team, security officer, and
   release engineering teams. Diversity in hardware support broadens
   the options for FreeBSD consumers by offering new features and
   usage opportunities (such as support for 64-bit CPUs, use in
   embedded environments, etc.), but these benefits must always be
   carefully considered in terms of the real-world maintenance cost
   associated with additional platform support.

   The FreeBSD Project differentiates platform targets into four
   tiers. Each tier includes a specification of the requirements for
   an architecture to be in that tier, as well as specifying the
   obligations of developers with regards to the platform. In
   addition, a policy is defined regarding the circumstances required
   to change the tier of an architecture.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.2 Tier 1: Fully Supported Architectures

   Tier 1 platforms are fully supported by the security officer,
   release engineering, and toolchain maintenance staff. New features
   added to the operating system must be fully functional across all
   Tier 1 architectures for every release (features which are
   inherently architecture-specific, such as support for hardware
   device drivers, may be exempt from this requirement). In general,
   all Tier 1 platforms must have build and Tinderbox support either
   in the FreeBSD.org cluster, or be easily available for all
   developers. Embedded platforms may substitute an emulator
   available in the FreeBSD cluster for actual hardware.

   Tier 1 architectures are expected to be Production Quality with
   respects to all aspects of the FreeBSD operating system, including
   installation and development environments.

   Tier 1 architectures are expected to be completely integrated into
   the source tree and have all features necessary to produce an
   entire system relevant for that target architecture. Tier 1
   architectures generally have at least 6 active developers.

   Tier 1 architectures are expected to be fully supported by the
   ports system. All the ports should build on a Tier 1 platform, or
   have the appropriate filters to prevent the inappropriate ones
   from building there. The packaging system must support all Tier 1
   architectures. To ensure an architecture's Tier 1 status,
   proponents of that architecture must show that all relevant
   packages can be built on that platform.

   Tier 1 embedded architectures must be able to cross-build packages
   on at least one other Tier 1 architecture. The packages must be
   the most relevant for the platform, but may be a non-empty subset
   of those that build natively.

   Tier 1 architectures must be fully documented. All basic
   operations need to be covered by the handbook or other documents.
   All relevant integration documentation must also be integrated
   into the tree, or readily available.

   Current Tier 1 platforms are i386, AMD64, and PC98.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.3 Tier 2: Developmental Architectures

   Tier 2 platforms are not supported by the security officer and
   release engineering teams. Platform maintainers are responsible
   for toolchain support in the tree. The toolchain maintainer is
   expected to work with the platform maintainers to refine these
   changes. Major new toolchain components are allowed to break
   support for Tier 2 architectures if the FreeBSD-local changes have
   not been incorporated upstream. The toolchain maintainers are
   expected to provide prompt review of any proposed changes and
   cannot block, through their inaction, changes going into the tree.
   New features added to FreeBSD should be feasible to implement on
   these platforms, but an implementation is not required before the
   feature may be added to the FreeBSD source tree. New features that
   may be difficult to implement on Tier 2 architectures should
   provide a means of disabling them on those architectures. The
   implementation of a Tier 2 architecture may be committed to the
   main FreeBSD tree as long as it does not interfere with production
   work on Tier 1 platforms, or substantially with other Tier 2
   platforms. Before a Tier 2 platform can be added to the FreeBSD
   base source tree, the platform must be able to boot multi-user on
   actual hardware. Generally, there must be at least three active
   developers working on the platform.

   Tier 2 architectures are usually systems targeted at Tier 1
   support, but that are still under development. Architectures
   reaching end of life may also be moved from Tier 1 status to Tier
   2 status as the availability of resources to continue to maintain
   the system in a Production Quality state diminishes. Well
   supported niche architectures may also be Tier 2.

   Tier 2 architectures may have some support for them integrated
   into the ports infrastructure. They may have cross compilation
   support added, at the discretion of portmgr. Some ports must built
   natively into packages if the package system supports that
   architecture. If not integrated into the base system, some
   external patches for the architecture for ports must be available.

   Tier 2 architectures can be integrated into the FreeBSD handbook.
   The basics for how to get a system running must be documented,
   although not necessarily for every single board or system a Tier 2
   architecture supports. The supported hardware list must exist and
   should be no more than a couple of months old. It should be
   integrated into the FreeBSD documentation.

   Current Tier 2 platforms are ARM, PowerPC, ia64, Sparc64 and
   sun4v.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.4 Tier 3: Experimental Architectures

   Tier 3 platforms are not supported by the security officer and
   release engineering teams. At the discretion of the toolchain
   maintainer, they may be supported in the toolchain. Tier 3
   platforms are architectures in the early stages of development,
   for non-mainstream hardware platforms, or which are considered
   legacy systems unlikely to see broad future use. New Tier 3
   systems will not be committed to the base source tree. Support for
   Tier 3 systems may be worked on in the FreeBSD Perforce
   Repository, providing source control and easier change integration
   from the main FreeBSD tree. Platforms that transition to Tier 3
   status may be removed from the tree if they are no longer actively
   supported by the FreeBSD developer community at the discretion of
   the release engineer.

   Tier 3 platforms may have ports support, either integrated or
   external, but do not require it.

   Tier 3 platforms must have the basics documented for how to build
   a kernel and how to boot it on at least one target hardware or
   emulation environment. This documentation need not be integrated
   into the FreeBSD tree.

   Current Tier 3 platforms are MIPS and S/390(R).

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.5 Tier 4: Unsupported Architectures

   Tier 4 systems are not supported in any form by the project.

   All systems not otherwise classified into a support tier are Tier
   4 systems.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

  12.6 Policy on Changing the Tier of an Architecture

   Systems may only be moved from one tier to another by approval of
   the FreeBSD Core Team, which shall make that decision in
   collaboration with the Security Officer, Release Engineering, and
   toolchain maintenance teams.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

13 Ports Specific FAQ

   1. Adding a New Port

                13.1.1. How do I add a new port?

                13.1.2. Any other things I need to know when I add a
                new port?

   2. Removing an Existing Port

                13.2.1. How do I remove an existing port?

   3. Repository Copies

                13.3.1. When do we need a repository copy?

                13.3.2. When do we not need a repository copy?

                13.3.3. What do I need to do?

   4. Ports Freeze

                13.4.1. What is a "ports freeze"?

                13.4.2. How long is a ports freeze?

                13.4.3. What does it mean to me?

                13.4.4. How do I know when the ports freeze starts?

                13.4.5. How do I know when the ports freeze ends?

   5. Creating a New Category

                13.5.1. What is the procedure for creating a new
                category?

                13.5.2. What do I need to do to implement a new
                physical category?

                13.5.3. What do I need to do to implement a new
                virtual category?

   6. Miscellaneous Questions

                13.6.1. How do I know if my port is building
                correctly or not?

                13.6.2. I added a new port. Do I need to add it to
                the INDEX?

                13.6.3. Are there any other files I am not allowed to
                touch?

                13.6.4. What is the proper procedure for updating the
                checksum for a port's distfile when the file changes
                without a version change?

    1. Adding a New Port

   13.1.1. How do I add a new port?

   First, please read the section about repository copies.

   The easiest way to add a new port is to use the addport script
   from your machine (located in the ports/Tools/scripts directory).
   It will add a port from the directory you specify, determining the
   category automatically from the port Makefile. It will also add an
   entry to the port's category Makefile. It was written by Michael
   Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org> and Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.org>, and
   is currently maintained by Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>, so
   please send questions/patches about addport to him.

   13.1.2. Any other things I need to know when I add a new port?

   Check the port, preferably to make sure it compiles and packages
   correctly. This is the recommended sequence:

 # make install
 # make package
 # make deinstall
 # pkg_add package you built above
 # make deinstall
 # make reinstall
 # make package
            

   The Porters Handbook contains more detailed instructions.

   Use portlint(1) to check the syntax of the port. You do not
   necessarily have to eliminate all warnings but make sure you have
   fixed the simple ones.

   If the port came from a submitter who has not contributed to the
   Project before, add that person's name to the Additional
   Contributors section of the FreeBSD Contributors List.

   Close the PR if the port came in as a PR. To close a PR, just do
   edit-pr PR# on freefall and change the state from open to closed.
   You will be asked to enter a log message and then you are done.

    2. Removing an Existing Port

   13.2.1. How do I remove an existing port?

   First, please read the section about repository copies. Before you
   remove the port, you have to verify there are no other ports
   depending on it.

     * Make sure there is no dependency on the port in the ports
       collection:

          * The port's PKGNAME should appear in exactly one line in a
            recent INDEX file.

          * No other ports should contain any reference to the port's
            directory or PKGNAME in their Makefiles

     * Then, remove the port:

         1. Remove the port's files via cvs remove.

         2. Remove SUBDIR listing of the port in the parent directory
            Makefile.

         3. Add an entry to ports/MOVED.

         4. Remove the port from ports/LEGAL if it is there.

   Alternatively, you can use the rmport script, from
   ports/Tools/scripts. This script has been written by Vasil Dimov
   <vd@FreeBSD.org>, who is also its current maintainer, so please
   send questions, patches or suggestions about rmport to him.

    3. Repository Copies

   13.3.1. When do we need a repository copy?

   When you want to add a port that is related to any port that is
   already in the tree in a separate directory, you have to do a
   repository copy. Here related means it is a different version or a
   slightly modified version. Examples are print/ghostscript*
   (different versions) and x11-wm/windowmaker* (English-only and
   internationalized version).

   Another example is when a port is moved from one subdirectory to
   another, or when you want to change the name of a directory
   because the author(s) renamed their software even though it is a
   descendant of a port already in a tree.

   13.3.2. When do we not need a repository copy?

   When there is no history to preserve. If a port is added into a
   wrong category and is moved immediately, it suffices to simply cvs
   remove the old one and addport the new one.

   13.3.3. What do I need to do?

   File a PR in GNATS, listing the reasons for the repository copy
   request. Assign it to portmgr and set state to repocopy. In a few
   days, portmgr will do a repository copy from the old to the new
   location, and reassign the PR back to you. Once everything is
   done, perform the following:

     * When a port has been repo copied:

         1. Do a force commit on the files of the copied port,
            stating repository copy was performed.

         2. Upgrade the copied port to the new version. Remember to
            change the LATEST_LINK so there are no duplicate ports
            with the same name. In some rare cases it may be
            necessary to change the PORTNAME instead of LATEST_LINK,
            but this should only be done when it is really needed --
            e.g. using an existing port as the base for a very
            similar program with a different name, or upgrading a
            port to a new upstream version which actually changes the
            distribution name, like the transition from
            textproc/libxml to textproc/libxml2. In most cases,
            changing LATEST_LINK should suffice.

         3. Add the new subdirectory to the SUBDIR listing in the
            parent directory Makefile. You can run make checksubdirs
            in the parent directory to check this.

         4. If the port changed categories, modify the CATEGORIES
            line of the port's Makefile accordingly

         5. Add an entry to ports/MOVED, if you remove the original
            port.

     * When removing a port:

         1. Perform a thorough check of the ports collection for any
            dependencies on the old port location/name, and update
            them. Running grep on INDEX is not enough because some
            ports have dependencies enabled by compile-time options.
            A full grep -r of the ports collection is recommended.

         2. Remove the old port, the old SUBDIR entry and the old
            module entry.

         3. Add an entry to ports/MOVED.

     * After repo moves ("rename" operations where a port is copied
       and the old location is removed):

         1. Follow the same steps that are outlined in the previous
            two entries, to activate the new location of the port and
            remove the old one.

    4. Ports Freeze

   13.4.1. What is a "ports freeze"?

   Before a release, it is necessary to restrict commits to the ports
   tree for a short period of time while the packages and the release
   itself are being built. This is to ensure consistency among the
   various parts of the release, and is called the "ports freeze".

   For more information on the background and policies surrounding a
   ports freeze, see the Portmgr Quality Assurance page.

   13.4.2. How long is a ports freeze?

   Usually a week or two.

   13.4.3. What does it mean to me?

   During the ports freeze, you are not allowed to commit anything to
   the tree without explicit approval from the Ports Management Team.
   "Explicit approval" here means that you send a patch to the Ports
   Management Team for review and get a reply saying, "Go ahead and
   commit it."

   Not everything is allowed to be committed during a freeze. Please
   see the Portmgr Quality Assurance page for more information.

   Note that you do not have implicit permission to fix a port during
   the freeze just because it is broken.

   13.4.4. How do I know when the ports freeze starts?

   The ports management team will send out warning messages to the
   FreeBSD ports mailing list and FreeBSD committer's mailing list
   announcing the start of the impending release, usually two or
   three weeks in advance. The exact starting time will not be
   determined until a few days before the actual release. This is
   because the ports freeze has to be synchronized with the release,
   and it is usually not known until then when exactly the release
   will be rolled.

   When the freeze starts, there will be another announcement to the
   FreeBSD ports mailing list and FreeBSD committer's mailing list,
   of course.

   13.4.5. How do I know when the ports freeze ends?

   A few hours after the release, the ports management team will send
   out a mail to the FreeBSD ports mailing list and FreeBSD
   committer's mailing list announcing the end of the ports freeze.
   Note that the release being cut does not automatically end the
   freeze. We have to make sure there will not be any last minute
   snafus that result in an immediate re-rolling of the release.

    5. Creating a New Category

   13.5.1. What is the procedure for creating a new category?

   Please see Proposing a New Category in the Porter's Handbook. Once
   that procedure has been followed and the PR has been assigned to
   Ports Management Team <portmgr@FreeBSD.org>, it is their decision
   whether or not to approve it. If they do, it is their
   responsibility to do the following:

    1. Perform any needed repocopies. (This only applies to physical
       categories.)

    2. Update the VALID_CATEGORIES definition in
       ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.

    3. Assign the PR back to you.

   13.5.2. What do I need to do to implement a new physical category?

   The procedure is a strict superset of the one to repocopy
   individual ports (see above).

    1. Upgrade each copied port's Makefile. Do not connect the new
       category to the build yet.

       To do this, you will need to:

         1. Change the port's CATEGORIES (this was the point of the
            exercise, remember?) The new category should be listed
            first. This will help to ensure that the the PKGORIGIN is
            correct.

         2. Run a make describe. Since the top-level make index that
            you will be running in a few steps is an iteration of
            make describe over the entire ports hierarchy, catching
            any errors here will save you having to re-run that step
            later on.

         3. If you want to be really thorough, now might be a good
            time to run portlint(1).

    2. Check that the PKGORIGINs are correct. The ports system uses
       each port's CATEGORIES entry to create its PKGORIGIN, which is
       used to connect installed packages to the port directory they
       were built from. If this entry is wrong, common port tools
       like pkg_version(1) and portupgrade(1) fail.

       To do this, use the chkorigin.sh tool, as follows: env
       PORTSDIR=/path/to/ports sh -e
       /path/to/ports/Tools/scripts/chkorigin.sh . This will check
       every port in the ports tree, even those not connected to the
       build, so you can run it directly after the repocopy. Hint: do
       not forget to look at the PKGORIGINs of any slave ports of the
       ports you just repocopied!

    3. On your own local system, test the proposed changes: first,
       comment out the SUBDIR entries in the old ports' categories'
       Makefiles; then enable building the new category in
       ports/Makefile. Run make checksubdirs in the affected category
       directories to check the SUBDIR entries. Next, in the ports/
       directory, run make index. This can take over 40 minutes on
       even modern systems; however, it is a necessary step to
       prevent problems for other people.

    4. Once this is done, you can commit the updated ports/Makefile
       to connect the new category to the build and also commit the
       Makefile changes for the old category or categories.

    5. Add appropriate entries to ports/MOVED.

    6. Update the instructions for cvsup(1):

          * add the category to distrib/cvsup/sup/README

          * adding the following files into
            distrib/cvsup/sup/ports-categoryname: list.cvs and
            releases.

          * add the category to
            src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile

       (Note: these are in the src, not the ports, repository). If
       you are not a src committer, you will need to submit a PR for
       this.

    7. Update the list of categories used by sysinstall(8) in
       src/usr.sbin/sysinstall.

    8. Update the documentation by modifying the following:

          * the section of the Handbook that lists the cvsup
            collections.

          * the list of categories in the Porter's Handbook

          * www/en/ports/categories. Note that these are now
            displayed by sub-groups, as specified in
            www/en/ports/categories.descriptions.

       (Note: these are in the docs, not the ports, repository). If
       you are not a docs committer, you will need to submit a PR for
       this.

    9. Only once all the above have been done, and no one is any
       longer reporting problems with the new ports, should the old
       ports be deleted from their previous locations in the
       repository.

   It is not necessary to manually update the ports web pages to
   reflect the new category. This is now done automatically via your
   change to www/en/ports/categories and the daily automated rebuild
   of INDEX.

   13.5.3. What do I need to do to implement a new virtual category?

   This is much simpler than a physical category. You only need to
   modify the following:

     * src/usr.sbin/sysinstall

     * the list of categories in the Porter's Handbook

     * www/en/ports/categories

    6. Miscellaneous Questions

   13.6.1. How do I know if my port is building correctly or not?

   First, go check http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/. There you
   will find error logs from the latest package building runs on all
   supported platforms for the most recent branches.

   However, just because the port does not show up there does not
   mean it is building correctly. (One of the dependencies may have
   failed, for instance.) The relevant directories are available on
   pointyhat under /a/portbuild/<arch>/<major_version> so feel free
   to dig around. Each architecture and version has the following
   subdirectories:

 errors        error logs from latest <major_version> run on <arch>
 logs          all logs from latest <major_version> run on <arch>
 packages      packages from latest <major_version> run on <arch>
 bak/errors    error logs from last complete <major_version> run on <arch>
 bak/logs      all logs from last complete <major_version> run on <arch>
 bak/packages  packages from last complete <major_version> run on <arch>

   Basically, if the port shows up in packages, or it is in logs but
   not in errors, it built fine. (The errors directories are what you
   get from the web page.)

   13.6.2. I added a new port. Do I need to add it to the INDEX?

   No, INDEX is no longer stored in the CVS repository. The file can
   either be generated by running make index, or a pre-generated
   version can be downloaded with make fetchindex.

   13.6.3. Are there any other files I am not allowed to touch?

   Any file directly under ports/, or any file under a subdirectory
   that starts with an uppercase letter (Mk/, Tools/, etc.). In
   particular, the ports management team is very protective of
   ports/Mk/bsd.port*.mk so do not commit changes to those files
   unless you want to face his wra(i)th.

   13.6.4. What is the proper procedure for updating the checksum for
   a port's distfile when the file changes without a version change?

   When the checksum for a port's distfile is updated due to the
   author updating the file without changing the port's revision, the
   commit message should include a summary of the relevant diffs
   between the original and new distfile to ensure that the distfile
   has not been corrupted or maliciously altered. If the current
   version of the port has been in the ports tree for a while, a copy
   of the old distfile will usually be available on the ftp servers;
   otherwise the author or maintainer should be contacted to find out
   why the distfile has changed.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

14 Issues Specific To Developers Who Are Not Committers

   A few people who have access to the FreeBSD machines do not have
   commit bits. For instance, the project is willing to give access
   to the GNATS database to contributors who have shown interest and
   dedication in working on Problem Reports.

   Almost all of this document will apply to these developers as well
   (except things specific to commits and the mailing list
   memberships that go with them). In particular, we recommend that
   you read:

     * Administrative Details

     * Conventions

         Note: You should get your mentor to add you to the
         "Additional Contributors"
         (doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml),
         if you are not already listed there.

     * Developer Relations

     * SSH Quick-Start Guide

     * The FreeBSD Committers' Big List of Rules

     --------------------------------------------------------------

15 Perks of the Job

   Unfortunately, there are not many perks involved with being a
   committer. Recognition as a competent software engineer is
   probably the only thing that will be of benefit in the long run.
   However, there are at least some perks:

   Direct access to cvsup-master

           As a committer, you may apply to Jun Kuriyama
           <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> for direct access to
           cvsup-master.FreeBSD.org, providing the public key output
           from cvpasswd yourusername@FreeBSD.org
           freefall.FreeBSD.org. Please note: you must specify
           freefall.FreeBSD.org on the cvpasswd command line even
           though the actual server is cvsup-master. Access to
           cvsup-master should not be overused as it is a busy
           machine.

   Free 4-CD and DVD Sets

           FreeBSD committers can get a free 4-CD or DVD set at
           conferences from FreeBSD Mall, Inc.. The sets are no
           longer available as a subscription due to the high
           shipment costs to countries outside the USA.

     --------------------------------------------------------------

16 Miscellaneous Questions

   16.1. Why are trivial or cosmetic changes to files on a vendor
   branch a bad idea?

   16.2. How do I add a new file to a branch?

   16.3. What "meta" information should I include in a commit
   message?

   16.4. How do I access people.FreeBSD.org to put up personal or
   project information?

   16.5. Where are the mailing list archives stored?

   16.6. I would like to mentor a new committer. What process do I
   need to follow?

   16.1. Why are trivial or cosmetic changes to files on a vendor
   branch a bad idea?

   * From now on, every new vendor release of that file will need to
     have patches merged in by hand.

   * From now on, every new vendor release of that file will need to
     have patches verified by hand.

   * The -j option does not work very well. Ask David O'Brien
     <obrien@FreeBSD.org> for horror stories.

   16.2. How do I add a new file to a branch?

   To add a file onto a branch, simply checkout or update to the
   branch you want to add to and then add the file using the add
   operation as you normally would. This works fine for the doc and
   ports trees. The src tree uses SVN and requires more care because
   of the mergeinfo properties. See section 1.4.6 of the Subversion
   Primer for details. Refer to SubversionPrimer/Merging for details
   on how to perform an MFC.

   16.3. What "meta" information should I include in a commit
   message?

   As well as including an informative message with each commit you
   may need to include some additional information as well.

   This information consists of one or more lines containing the key
   word or phrase, a colon, tabs for formatting, and then the
   additional information.

   The key words or phrases are:

   PR:            The problem report (if any) which is affected       
                  (typically, by being closed) by this commit.        
                  The name and e-mail address of the person that      
   Submitted by:  submitted the fix; for committers, just the         
                  username on the FreeBSD cluster.                    
                  The name and e-mail address of the person or people 
                  that reviewed the change; for committers, just the  
   Reviewed by:   username on the FreeBSD cluster. If a patch was     
                  submitted to a mailing list for review, and the     
                  review was favorable, then just include the list    
                  name.                                               
                  The name and e-mail address of the person or people 
                  that approved the change; for committers, just the  
                  username on the FreeBSD cluster. It is customary to 
                  get prior approval for a commit if it is to an area 
                  of the tree to which you do not usually commit. In  
   Approved by:   addition, during the run up to a new release all    
                  commits must be approved by the release engineering 
                  team. If these are your first commits then you      
                  should have passed them past your mentor first, and 
                  you should list your mentor, as in                  
                  ``username-of-mentor (mentor)''.                    
   Obtained from: The name of the project (if any) from which the     
                  code was obtained.                                  
                  If you wish to receive an e-mail reminder to MFC at 
   MFC after:     a later date, specify the number of days, weeks, or 
                  months after which an MFC is planned.               
                  If the change is related to a security              
   Security:      vulnerability or security exposure, include one or  
                  more references or a description of the issue.      

   Example 1. Commit log for a commit based on a PR

   You want to commit a change based on a PR submitted by John Smith
   containing a patch. The end of the commit message should look
   something like this.

 ...

 PR:                foo/12345
 Submitted by:      John Smith <John.Smith@example.com>

   Example 2. Commit log for a commit needing review

   You want to change the virtual memory system. You have posted
   patches to the appropriate mailing list (in this case,
   freebsd-arch) and the changes have been approved.

 ...

 Reviewed by:       -arch

   Example 3. Commit log for a commit needing approval

   You want to commit a change to a section of the tree with a
   MAINTAINER assigned. You have collaborated with the listed
   MAINTAINER, who has told you to go ahead and commit.

 ...

 Approved by:        abc

   Where abc is the account name of the person who approved.

   Example 4. Commit log for a commit bringing in code from OpenBSD

   You want to commit some code based on work done in the OpenBSD
   project.

 ...

 Obtained from:      OpenBSD

   Example 5. Commit log for a change to FreeBSD-CURRENT with a
   planned commit to FreeBSD-STABLE to follow at a later date.

   You want to commit some code which will be merged from
   FreeBSD-CURRENT into the FreeBSD-STABLE branch after two weeks.

 ...

 MFC after:      2 weeks

   Where 2 is the number of days, weeks, or months after which an MFC
   is planned. The weeks option may be day, days, week, weeks, month,
   months, or may be left off (in which case, days will be assumed).

   In some cases you may need to combine some of these.

   Consider the situation where a user has submitted a PR containing
   code from the NetBSD project. You are looking at the PR, but it is
   not an area of the tree you normally work in, so you have decided
   to get the change reviewed by the arch mailing list. Since the
   change is complex, you opt to MFC after one month to allow
   adequate testing.

   The extra information to include in the commit would look
   something like

 PR:                 foo/54321
 Submitted by:       John Smith <John.Smith@example.com>
 Reviewed by:        -arch
 Obtained from:      NetBSD
 MFC after:          1 month

   16.4. How do I access people.FreeBSD.org to put up personal or
   project information?

   people.FreeBSD.org is the same as freefall.FreeBSD.org. Just
   create a public_html directory. Anything you place in that
   directory will automatically be visible under
   http://people.FreeBSD.org/.

   16.5. Where are the mailing list archives stored?

   The mailing lists are archived under /g/mail which will show up as
   /hub/g/mail with pwd(1). This location is accessible from any
   machine on the FreeBSD cluster.

   16.6. I would like to mentor a new committer. What process do I
   need to follow?

   See the New Account Creation Procedure document on the internal
   pages.

  Notes

   [1] The precise path depends on the *default base setting in your  
       supfile.                                                       

     --------------------------------------------------------------
